Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Weapons of Mass Deception
Bill Moyers lost me during the first few minutes of his excellent PBS special, "Buying the War."
Not because it was painful to watch - blood boils at about the same temperature as water, and you could have made strong tea out of mine - but because my life became stranded at the very place where his story begins: "Four years ago this spring the Bush administration took leave of reality and plunged our country into a war so poorly planned it soon turned into a disaster."
Burdened with a logical mind, I was never able to take leave of reality. As a result, just after Sept. 11, 2001, the country left me behind.
That tragic day, George W. Bush went missing. It took days for him to show up at ground zero with a bullhorn and a determined look on his face.
Even then I recognized bad acting. I already thought that Bush was an incompetent fool. So I watched with a growing sense of horror and disbelief as my badly frightened countrymen convinced themselves that they had a real leader in the White House, one they could count on and trust to make them safe again.
It like watching was mass hypnosis. It reminded me of the time when more than 900 people at Jonestown in Guyana lined up to drink arsenic-laced Kool-Aid. But on a larger and more tragic scale.
Six years later and counting, I'm still waiting for some proof of Osama bin Laden's guilt. We never really learned who was behind the attacks, and it's made for some fancy conspiracy theories. Bush said, "It's got bin Laden written all over it." But I wouldn't trust him to look outside and tell me it's raining. And if he knew so quickly after the attacks, why he didn't know a few days earlier, so he could stop them?
Walter Isaacson, then the chairman of CNN, told Moyers, "There was a patriotic fervor and the administration used it so that if you challenged anything you were made to feel that there was something wrong with that... And there was even almost a patriotism police..."
I was afraid of the "patriotism police," too. But it didn't stop me from writing about the emperor and his lack of clothes.
Then we attacked Afghanistan, because that's where bin Laden was hiding. Out of empathy for the people of Afghanistan, I was against it. But still, I fully expected bin Laden to be caught and brought to trial. Then we would learn exactly who and what was behind the attacks on Sept. 11.
Soon we had stopped caring about bin Laden altogether. And we never took a close, hard look at Saudi Arabia, either - a country which gave us 17 of the 19 suicide hijackers.
The turning point - the day I realized logic had gone out of the window, never to return - was when I read Seymour M. Hersh's piece in The New Yorker describing the administration's plans to invade Iraq.
We had been embargoing Iraq for years. Iraqis were suffering for lack of food and medicine. Children were dying. UN weapons inspectors had been on the ground and found nothing. And as bad as Saddam Hussein was, there were other tinpot dictators around the world who threatened us more. North Korea, with its lust for nuclear weapons, came to mind. And Myanmar, whose opium trade still constitutes a major threat to our health and our economy.
But there was Congress, lining up to drink the Kool-Aid. When today's presidential candidates tell you they were "misled" back then, don't believe them. It was as clear as the noses on their craven faces.
Instead of logic, we were given a new piece of jargon: weapons of mass destruction. What weapon isn't capable of mass destruction? It became such a familiar phrase that it morphed into an acronym, WMDs. Supposedly, Saddam had them and we were supposed to be very, very afraid.
Many people around the world refused to drink the Kool-Aid. Millions took to the streets to protest the invasion of Iraq. My local newspaper, the Brattleboro Reformer, ran a "No War in Iraq" banner under its masthead for months.
The question Moyers was trying to answer - but doesn't, quite - is this: if I, a small-time columnist in a small-town newspaper, knew an Iraq war was a shuck. And if Hersh, with his flawless sources in high places knew, then why didn't the rest of the mainstream media know? What happened to logic? What happened to common sense?
Dan Rather had an explanation. "Fear is in every newsroom in the country," he told Moyers. "If you don't go along to get along, you're going to get the reputation of being a troublemaker. There's also the fear that, you know, particularly in networks, they've become huge, international conglomerates. They have big needs, legislative needs... And that puts a seed in your mind; of well, if you stick your neck out, if you take the risk of going against the grain with your reporting, is anybody going to back you up?"
Others claim that the mainstream media was too afraid of losing its "insider" status, or access to information. Or that reporters were afraid of losing their big salaries and their feelings of importance.
Instead, they lost their souls.
And so did the country. The damage America has done in the Middle East - and may continue doing, if the Bush Administration has its way - will, like slavery, hang over our heads and color our culture for centuries.
In olden Japan, seppuku was a tradition. When a leader was shamed or disgraced or screwed up really badly, he would ritually kneel, pray, maybe write a death poem, and then plunge his sword into his belly and disembowel himself. Often a loyal comrade would then step in and cut off his head.
Don't hold your breath.
Joyce Marcel is a columnist and journalist in southern Vermont. A collection of her columns, "A Thousand Words or Less," is available through joycemarcel.com. And write her at joycemarcel@yahoo.com.

37 Comments so far
Show AllJoyce:
You replay the events as if it weren't all DIRECTED by the MSM. Remember, it's not that our fellow citizens are stupid, misled by Bush alone. No. Bush is NOTHING without his full-on corporate sponsors. Big corporations are making money from the war, the media-military-industrial complex foisted this war upon us in order to profit at the expense of the public. Our government may spend 300 billion or 300 trillion, but think of the profits of all the corporations! Exxon, Raytheon, Halliburton... this list is so long, they've had a great run, haven't they? Oh my gosh, there's money to be made here! And it really isn't about anything else, is it? Corruption is just the grease of the corporate state.
The media isn't 'afraid' of anything. They are making money and well-paid. You watch the TV celebrities, no? Do you know how much they made during the last few years? Or how about the editors of our papers? How much did they make over the last few years? How many corporations own all MSM outlets? Six.
This is not about feelings. It's not about ethics. It's not about people 'getting it' or 'thinking for themselves.'
It's about profits; it's about falling in line behind a corrupt chain of command, a bunch liars and theives operating like a mafia of huge proportions.
Anyone who works at a bureaucracy knows what I'm talking about. Silence is rewarded! Obedience is rewarded.
And it is going to get worse before it gets better.
Don't forget the ever-so-subtle messages to Congress: the anthrax letters and Wellstone's plane crash.
Duck and cover is still the norm.
Joyce, great article!
You're absolutely right. The big media have "lost their souls" and can not be relied on to provide realistic news reporting.
Also, you nailed it by saying that this misadventure in Iraq will be a disgrace to America, similar to slavery, for decades to come.
Stiv Whitman:
You're factually correct that corporations will make profits from their support of the war and your other comments.
But, It's not only "about profits."
It was about revenge. Someone had to pay for 911. The American leader pointed to Saddam Hussein and the American citizens blinded followed, losing their soul and ethical high ground. It's a disgrace, similar to slavery.
Its a slam dunk-Tenet
We now know Iraq has WMDS-Powell
In around Tikirt North South East West-Rummy
Nope! No WMDS here(chuckles)- Dubya
Osama been forgotten..........
Lying MOFO's!
The Republican Party knows how to push the voters' fear and greed buttons to win elections and assure that the neocon agenda remains effectively unchallenged. The American electorate has not wised up to this and will probably fall for it again in 2008.
The corporate media is in the business of selling stories, not facts. The neocons wrote the stories, the media sold them, and continues to sell them. "Faulty intelligence" stories alone continue to be a large and successful category. George Tenet didn't want to miss this bonanza.
Stiv hits the nail on the head. Its all about money. When wars end, war profiteering diminishes. The media will never challenge the Party's assertion that the war on terrorism is a "war without end". A war without end is a revenue stream without end.
To assure a steady supply of new terrorists, Paul Wolfowitz is steering World Bank policy to further impoverish the world's poorest people. This will provide an on-going excuse for the war without end and an on-going fleecing of American taxpayers.
"And we never took a close, hard look at Saudi Arabia, either - a country which gave us 17 of the 19 suicide hijackers".
To this day I am still flummoxed as to how this incontrovertible TRUTH escaped media attention OVER and OVER and OVER again....
Never once in main stream media carefully examined and teased out....
Leading me painfully to only two conclusions....
Either abject DENIAL or
mendacious COMPLICITY....
Joyce--
As a part of the working press, you have probably noticed that not only don't they dig for the truth every time, they also don't always lie. Things would be so much easier if one or the other more consistently occurred.
Some would like to attribute this to deliberate conspiracy by the MSM. I don't think they are that smart. Perhaps they are nothing more than a mirror covered room distorting everything they reflect--or perhaps we are the mirrors distorting them to our own purposes.
skeezyks is absolutely right -it is about the money! Corporations run our government -and our govermnent is currently run by corporate criminals!
But the MSM is right onboard because most players in the the MSM are profiting from this invasion/occupation. Is it GE who owns NBC (they are weapons producers as well!!!).
Reporters in MSM are 'told' what to say and how to say it...they will continue to do this as long as they are making money-it is sickening really!
stiv and others are correct - it is only about money and profits. Revenge for 9/11 was used by the hucksters as a sales pitch for the war; it was never a real reason for invading Iraq. "War for Profiteers" just doesn't make a good slogan.
The total lack of reporting, investigation, or outrage at the Saudi involvment in 9/11 baffles me as well. Why didn't we invade Saudi Arabia? They had oil AND hijackers! At least 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis, yet Saudis and bin Ladens in particular were the only people allowed by the US government to fly in the days immediately after 9/11...allowed to leave the US without questioning by authorities, without regard to their politics and familial relationship with the man named by every US official from Bush on down as the one behind 9/11. I'm curious as to how we are so sure. After all, a CIA chum of mine told me we knew Iraq had WMD because Saddam said he had them. When I asked him why he didn't believe anything else Saddam said but would attack Iraq based on his word, he looked at me as if I just didn't get it. Apparently, intelligence means believing what you want to believe, or believing what Cheney wants you to believe.
Jonthenet,
It's very obvious that you do not share the values of those here on Commondreams. I wonder which neocon organization is paying you to spout propaganda on our treasured website?
Great article, except for this:
"And Myanmar, whose opium trade still constitutes a major threat to our health and our economy."
C'mon, Joyce. Don't use the lies of one war to support the commission of another. The drug-related "threat to our health and our economy" doesn't come from opium, crack, methamphetamines or anything else; it comes from a drugwar which has created criminal gangs with vast pools of unregulated money and the will to do anything to make more of it. If terrorists do ever get a nuclear device into this country, they will probably use the services of drug gangs to do it, since the lure of the vast drug market here has caused them to create of all sorts of ways to evade border security.
The real drug threat comes from the drugwar. Relegalization and regulation will eliminate the threat. Unfortunately for us, this also runs up against the superstitions of the masses who believe it is necessary to stifle freedom in the name of "fighting drugs". More significantly, it runs afoul of the prison-industrial complex who profit so handsomely from the misery the drugwar causes. This is the reason that the main opposition to California's medical cannabis law, and the largest source of opposition money, came from the California prison guard's union.
I spent 5 years in Federal prison for possessing plants used to grow medical cannabis. I still bristle when I read otherwise-intelligent and educated people falling into drugwar speak.
You should know better, Joyce.
Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage.
-Mencken
And just yesterday the Dumbya made a speech that cited Al Qaida or Osama over twenty times, while talking about Iraq. So they are now the principal enemy in Iraq, where they dared not show their faces pre-2003! How did they get there? Who let them in? Whose "strategy" created that problem?
The continued occupation of Iraq is the most superb Al Qaida recruiting event that's ever been invented. Osama himself could not have developed such an effective method of gathering new recruits.
Jonthenet: The war in Iraq was unplanned and lost. Any war college student will tell you that the war isn't won until the peace is secured. Peace has not been secured in Iraq and it will not be using military force.
The war against radical Islam was brought to Iraq by George W Bush. Before the invasion, the term "Iraqi terrorist" was a non-sequitor.
Nobody is dissing our fighting men. The fact that two units are, in part, looking for bin Laden (in the Tora Bora complex paid for by the CIA during Russia's Afghan incursion) while 125,000+ are wasting their time, life, and limbs in Iraq is not their fault, it is Bush's fault. The fact that bin Laden has not been hunted down is Bush's fault. The fact that more Americans have died in Iraq than on 9/11 is Bush's fault. Supporting the troops means bringing them home from an illegal occupation, not extending their tours. Supporting the troops means providing them the best medical treatment taxes can buy after they have given their limbs, eyes, or psyches for Bush's lies, not using procurement as a money-laundering operation for Halliburton. Bush lies and our troops die.
The History Channel did an excellent documentary on the hunt for Bin Laden. It was a CIA effort, and when they asked for help from the military, they told the CIA to use the local Afghans. They did and entrusted surveillance of the remote passages into Pakistan to local war lords, who later turned out to be Bin Laden allies. That isn't dissing our troops, it is the truth about a specific decision.
When I think of quality investigative reporting, I think of the e-mails missing off of the white house server and official business being conducted on Republican party (partisan) servers, both actions in clear violation of the law on white house transparency. If we had a modern day Bernstein and Woodward team, they would rip this case wide open.
Does anyone care?
Would Americans care about that more than American Idol, the newest playstation, Harry Potter or the next Anna Nichole tabloid article?
I would have to say that David Corn did an excellent job with investigative reporting for the "Lies of George Bush" book. But we still have Cheney going around like an Alzhiemer's senior saying that 9/11 - Al Qaeda - and Saddam are connected.
Joyce, really enjoyed the article, but....sometimes a particular point of grammar stick with us and since you are a professional (and talented) writer, I must point out that "WMD" is not an acronym. It is of course and abbreviation, but acronyms need to form words like MASH (Mobile Army Surgical Hospital), or NATO etc...
Sorry to be so OT.
Just read my post. So full of typos, I ought to think twice about lecturing others. LOL!
B
To Jonthenet:
What most people have"on the brain" on this site is not Tora Bora-but a litany of half-truths-distortions-and outright lies that surrounded the invasion of Iraq. And now Iran is threatened because they may have a nuke or two sometime in the future?
Doesn't the fact that shrub dodged combat and the v-p got 5 deferments["I had other priorities'] bother you? C in C indeed.
Thank you, Joyce. God, I wish I'd read / hear more articles like this. I've felt exactly the same way.
A talking point that always makes me cringe when I hear it is the tired old "Iraq is distracting us from what we should be doing...finding Bin Laden!" Somehow, by carrying this ridiculous "War on Terror" to an even more illogical extreme by waging a war of aggression against Iraq, people are unable to face the completely horrifying, disgusting truth of what we've allowed to happen. We've given the reins of our government to a spoiled, imbecile of a tyrant and the moneyed-interests which installed and control him.
The stronger our denial that the emperor has no clothes, the stronger our support for a "War on Terror" that keeps his ignorance, incompetence, sociopathic callousness, cowardice, and outrageous sense of entitlement hidden behind OUR OWN collective self-delusion that maybe-possibly-please-God-let-it-be-true he is somehow being a war-time leader, doing the best he can to keep us safe.
George W. Bush remains in office for two reasons. The first is because he's ridden out the clock on America's outrage, and we're now afraid to face our own complicity in allowing him to play President. He's remained in office, and we've done nothing about it for so long that his stink has rubbed off onto us too. The second reason is that those who could stop him choose not to out of a misguided and dangerous power lust. They don't mind Bush's power grabs because they hope to one day have this same power for themselves. Vote for Hillary, anyone?
Good luck, America.
Dan Rather said a mouthful:
"There's also the fear that, you know, particularly in networks, they've become huge, international conglomerates. They have big needs, legislative needs… And that puts a seed in your mind; of well, if you stick your neck out, if you take the risk of going against the grain with your reporting, is anybody going to back you up?"
Thanks to Joyce Marcel for providing us this nugget.
Jonthenet, tell me - how do you get justice for the people killed in the twin towers by attacking a country that had nothing to do with it? How does a group of Marines raping a sixteen year old girl and killing her family because aMarine got the hots for her get justice for anyone? How can one be proud of those people?
I think the intelligence of your criminally stupid C in C (who has endangered the whole world by his stupidity) is reflected in a soldier I heard say "They hurt us so we are going out to smash whoever we can just to show them" - except Bush combines a bit of looting for his big business friends. He trades on the prestige of the Presidency to fool people who believe the President can do no wrong into supporting him; he trades on it to have thousands of young Americans (apart from the hundreds of thousands of those less than human Iraqis)killed and maimed and when they come home shattered he whips the rug out from under them by reneging on veterans care.
And the poor sucker soldiers (and their grieving families) get nothing - nothing for going out to spill their blood so that Bush's rich mates can suck billions of dollars out of the poor sucker US taxpayer who bravely defends Bush. And the administration lies to people - Pat Tilman.
Having been an Army officer for many years, in my opinion the US has not won the war - it has disastrously lost it. As one of your Congressman said the other day, if you pullout of Iraq now it will be a disaster but if you do not it will be a catastrophe.
Four years ago one phase of the war ended - and another commenced. How can one be proud of the US military, more powerful than any other in the world, defeating such a ragbag weakened army as that the Iraq had.
It is not wrong to criticise the President - it can be a patriotic duty.
Please don't blame President Bush or the so-called mainstream media. Don't blame anybody except yourself, and by that, I mean you, the American public. The majority of the American people, I'm sorry to say, is either politically ignorant and/or simply does not care. This majority makes up a country better known as the country of 3 S's: Stomach, Sports, and Sex (not necessarily in that order), and that's been the staple of the American thought. Some of you don't even know who your president is, and most of you don't even know it's not really Bush, but Cheney. You, and I mean the majority of you, elected President bush, or allowed him to be elected by using fraudulent voting machines that leave no paper trail. This was your fault. You could have refrained from voting. You could have boycotted the mainstream media by refusing to buy their newspapers or listening to their radio and TV stations. And you could have let them know this by writing to their sponsors, and totally boycotting their sponsors' products. You could have stopped paying taxes, but you were scared to do so. You could've done these and more, but you didn't. Then, why blame Bush? By now you know, or at least should know, that most of the members of Congress are crooked politicians who are corporate or AIPAC lackeys. What are you going to do about it in 08? Vote for the party of impeachment-off-the-table again, or worse, vote for Republicans? Don't you people ever get smart enough to know that they are sides of the same coin, the corporate Mafia? By now, of course, you have allowed your hands to be tied by the system that is leaving you no choice between the devil and the deep sea. You are now also victims of a political system with no way out, and this should prompt you to make some radical changes, peacefully and constitutionally, or by any other means available to respectful people like you.
You need to cause the system to change so that you would have more than two political parties, such as four or more because you, as the people, need real opposition parties to represent your interests. You also need to criminalize both campaign financing and lobbying. Until that day, you will be whining and crying with no way out--with none to blame but yourselves. Remember: Changes always comes from the people. Stop blaming Bush/Cheney, do something about it!
Sorry - forgot to say - what an excellent article.
But - Saila - I agree that a system which allows someone like Bush to stand for President is broken. But of course we blame Bush - Gore would not have rushed into Iraq, Bush's daddy had the sense to see that if he invaded Iraq in 1991 he woould have ended up in quagmire and would have ended up where his idiot son has placed the US and, unforunately, the rest of the world aho did not have the chance to vote for and against him - despite the fcat that he has created a bitter legacy for us. No, it is right to blame Bush because he is the person who blundered into Iraq, manipulated by Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz (driven by the dead hand of, Leo Sstrauss, a man whose formative years were spent in authoritarian Europe in the 1930s when his political philosophies were formed) Wolfowitz - now there's a man you can trust, wouldn't you say?
And I don't see the Democrats doing anything effective. They are not a party of impeachment - they have gone through a token, a charade, knowing that Bush would veto their bill. I do agree that they are tarred with teh same brush - they do not want to offend the Bus's rich mates because they want part of tha gravy too.
Jonthenet,
You are seriously advocating "leveling" countries in the Middle East? Sorry but I find your ignorance and lack of compassion simply astounding. There is no justification for violence unless it is self-defense. These are not our countries we are invading and occupying. Resisting occupation is a completely rational response - we would do the same if it happened in our own country. We don't belong there - we need to bring our troops home as soon as possilbe and start using our resources wisely to solve problems instead of create them.
Jontehnet - you mean bury the dead Bush slips in under cover of night, won't let us see or count, won't acknowledge, and won't attend services for? Try to keep up with reality rather than swallowing the KoolAid of how our "daisy cutters" and our AWOL president are so superior. Bush led us into an unnecessary war on lies, and he lost it while killing more Americans than 9/11 and more Iraqis than Saddam. He should be tried and hung as a war criminal.
Saila -- I agree that we must radically change and be willing to actually give up something. Most of us are lazy, content, self-centered and care more about a splinter in our finger than the suffering of 1/2 million people in another country. We care more for deaths of students than our military soldiers who are dying daily. Aren't both groups just as important. It seems we have lost the ability to empathize, to care -- really. I wonder what we are willing to give up to reclaim our freedom? Sadly, probably not much.
Yet, I don't only blame us (the people), I also blame Bushco, congress, the media and the supreme court, and administrations before Bush. We are all in it together – without willing participants of all, this would not be possible.
However, if I am to give any credit to Bush, it's that he's opened so many eyes. Not only has critical thinking improved, because of him I've looked at previous presidents and realized that I've been bushwhacked for years. It "ain't" easy coming out of the matrix.
Also as disgusting as it is, what genius came up with the idea of a war against an idea. We're fighting terrorism, it's not a country, it's not defined; we as an imperialist country can go after anyone under this guise. Incredible! And we bought it—swallowed it whole!!
Joyce's closing metaphor to seppuku is uncanny. Not only for its poignant truth, but also for the fact that I thought the exact same thing months ago! The only problem is, ritual suicide is intended for those with honor to retain or salvage. Bush doesn't have a drop of honorable blood in him, nor would he have the guts for seppuku. Lady Liberty will have to help him out.
http://www.bleedingheartsclub.com/index_files/bushido.htm
"what genius came up with the idea of a war against an idea."
Goerge Orwell?
And yes, America has been the world's sponsor and creator of terror for many decades. It's just a lot more obvious now.
S.
Hi all...see the following documentary, though long and about FOX news in particular, about the debilitation of journalism in our country. Thank God for CommonDreams and other progressive newswires and the internet for the ability to access news from the entire world. And, more frighteningly, pity the Stepford citizens who believe the manipulative crap that passes for news and gets them to goose-step to the current administrations tune.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743434902428
Keep on drinkin' the lies, Jonthe...
Wow. Thank you Joyce for putting in words what I've been feeling for years. I've made the same comments about the Emperor's clothes and drinking the poison Kool-aid. And you're right, this will follow us for years. We will have grandsons of Iraqis killed or maimed during King George's war signing on to become suicide bombers to kill our grandchildren.
As frightening to me as is the dishonesty of our government in the Iraq war and in many other things, and the equally active (not passive) acceptance of its lies and posturings by my fellow citizens, is the disappearance of the national press as a window for the truth.
In the late 1960's, I worked awhile for a local newpaper in Newport News, Virginia. I well remember that in a state election almost all of the editors and managers of the paper supported a new candidate, but because the paper's owner favored the incumbents, the paper was foursquare for them, not just in its editorials, but in the choice and placement of its articles on the candidates and the issues.
In those days, though, most papers were locally owned. Different owners had different opinions on things, so there was - nationwide at least - a salad of varying opinions. Now, with the increasing accumulation of newpapers, and other media as well, into the ownership of a few powerful individuals, I think of the power of the old Times-Herald's owner, and it is hard not to despair, for the great media owners are powerful and wealthy, and the powerful and wealthy tend to think alike: they believe above all in the protection of their power and wealth.
In how many old novels and movies did the heroes overcome government attempts to suppress evidence of its wrongdoing by giving the story to a newspaper which printed it for the citizenry? Perhaps this has always been more drama than fact, but the element of reliance on and trust in the fourth estate to keep the powerful honest is and has been vital to our freedom. If this is lost, what happens to us? How will we ever even learn of truths that are inconvenient to the powerful? The internet? But moves are being made even now to place restrictions on this medium as well.
Each generation has certain battles thrust upon it. They are not always as obvious and as clear-cut as WWII. I think that to us, here in the United States, has fallen the battle for continued freedom of thought and expression. If we don't win that battle, or even recognize that it is being waged, we may lose it forever.
And the danger of losing it is very real. In our lifetime, there has been tremendous effort expended on the study of human psychology and the ways to manipulate it. Much of this has been well-intentioned - trying to find ways to address mental illness, for example, and more has been neutral - the development of advertising for the realitively benign goal of selling products and services; but the knowledge gained is also applicable for darker purposes - to manipulate us to rule us.
It has already begun. The present administration has dispensed with truth completely, as unnecessary to its purposes, and has twisted the conscience of this nation with contemptuous ease. Although some of those originally fooled about the Iraq war and other frauds are finally awakening, this recognition is by no means complete. So many find it easier to continue in a lie rather than to admit they were fooled, (Heard the Dixie Chicks on any country music stations yet?) and those who promulgated the lies know this well and count on it.
Bush and Cheney and their co-conspirators are yet confidant they still have a majority of the public well in hand. This time they may be wrong. This time the news media still have a few independent and honest voices who now, finally, are being heard.
But what about next time?
I would be happy to donate a sword !
Angie Germany
this was never about wmd's. it's all in the smoking gun, PNAC, and not one of the major networks have the balls to take it on.
Ms. Marcel, this is a fine essay, but weakened by your references to 9/11 "conspiracy theories," a phrase used to stop people from thinking. 9/11 is the greatest "weapon of mass deception," which you seem to understand in pointing out that the government has produced no real evidence to back its official story.
I challenge anyone to look and listen to this video and not think that we were shown false video images on 9/11:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-FlbF9udyQ
Please ignore the text at the beginning, which was not written by the speaker, and just watch the images and listen to the narration. The speaker is Jeff King, a California physician with education experience in bioengineering - no expert, but someone capable of applying common sense and laws of physics. Judge for yourself whether what he says make sense.
There was a system of checks & balances re: the gov. & media, but that is gone with the wind.
You even have emperor bush talking about "catapulting the propaganda" and the Daily Show & others have caught on how the same talking points are repeated endlessly.
The way the human brain works the more you hear something stated as fact EVEN if you know what is being said is untrue is that the repeated words (in layman terms) wear a groove in your brain & you have to make a conscious effort to correct the incorrect facts.
I think this is how religion works, as a lapsed catholic of 59 years, I still remember all the parochial grade school teachings, of Jesus walking on water, or being born of a virgin, etc.
Stuff that if you told any other 59 year old who hadnt' been exposed to "religious propaganda" you would scoff at as a fairy tale.
The media (except for independent web sites) is completely corrupt & impossible to believe, they are simply mouthpieces for the white house & republicans & neocons. Kate (humpty)