EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
E-Mail Uproar Gives Dems Ammo vs. Rove
WASHINGTON - The fight over documents has gone to red alert.The White House acknowledges it cannot find four years' worth of e-mails from chief political strategist Karl Rove. The admission has thrust the Democrats' nemesis back into the center of attention and poses a fresh political challenge for President Bush.
The administration has acknowledged that some e-mails missing from Rove's Republican party account may relate to the firing of eight U.S. prosecutors last year. The Democratic-run Congress is investigating whether the firings resulted from political pressure by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and the White House.
Target: Rove For Democrats, the missing Rove e-mails is one more chance to pound away at their favorite target, the architect of Bush's 2000 and 2004 presidential victories and all-around White House political fixer.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., has compared the missing e-mails to the 18-minute gap on President Nixon's Watergate tapes. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., says the White House message to Congress is: "We are stonewalling."
The White House chalks it up to just another outbreak of Democratic Rove rage. "My experience has been that any time Karl Rove's name is mentioned, it adds to the ammunition, regardless of merit," White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino said.
Only Dick Cheney raises the same kind of anger - and there is not much they can do about the vice president, short of impeachment.
Miers, Rove testimony in question The Rove connection is sure to be raised when Gonzales testifies Tuesday before Leahy's committee. His appearance, Democratic and Republican lawmakers say, may determine whether the longtime Bush friend can hold onto his job.
Democrats plan to focus on the Justice Department's contradictory statements about the firings and Gonzales' shifting explanations of his own role.
Democrats now are seeking Rove's sworn public testimony in their investigation of dismissed U.S. attorneys. So far, the White House has agreed only to off-the-record interviews for Rove and former White House counsel Harriet Miers with committee members.
Department documents turned over to Congress suggested that Rove and Miers had an early role in planning the firings, despite initial White House statements to the contrary.
Democrats have threatened to issue subpoenas. But, due to the constitutional separation of executive and legislative powers, it is not clear they can force Rove to testify.
"He's been a pet symbol to Democrats," said Fred Greenstein, professor emeritus of politics at Princeton University. "It's clear that he is very important to Bush and that the president takes him very seriously, even if the 2008 election outcome would be totally unaffected by dropping Rove."
Despite Rove's reputation as a political grand master, there is not exactly a rush to his door among the current large field of Republican presidential hopefuls.
Previous attempts Democrats have had Rove in their cross hairs before; he always has slipped away.
He was implicated in the CIA leak case as someone who had passed on the identity of CIA undercover agent Valerie Plame to reporters. But he never was charged and never called to testify in the trial of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Cheney's former chief of staff. Libby was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice and is awaiting sentencing.
Rove also managed to emerge unscathed from investigations of administration and congressional ties to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
If Rove deliberately deleted e-mails relating to the firing of the prosecutors, Democrats suggest, he could run afoul of a 1978 law that requires the White House to keep documents that relate to presidential actions, decisions and deliberations.
Administration fatigue Republican strategist Rich Galen says Democrats could make the same mistakes that Republicans made under House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., in going after President Clinton after winning control of the House.
"That's what got us in big trouble in 1998 (midterm elections, when Republicans lost seats) and ultimately cost Newt his job as speaker. We so solely focused on going after Bill Clinton that people said, in essence, `We hired you to solve stuff - and not to spend all day, every day, trying to figure out how to make Bill Clinton's life miserable,'" said Galen, who worked for Gingrich when he was speaker.
Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, denies that his client deleted his own e-mails from a Republican-sponsored computer system. "His understanding, starting very, very early in the administration was that those e-mails were being archived," Luskin said.
Ross Baker, a political scientist at Rutgers University, said the controversy over the missing Rove e-mails is another sign of "the downward spiral of an old, tired administration."
It comes as public support for the war in Iraq continues to erode, Bush's approval ratings are in the mid-30s and the administration is embroiled in multiple scandals and ethics investigations.
"They've got serious combat fatigue after six years in office," said Baker. "The forces there are getting very thin."
© 2007 The Associated Press.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

9 Comments so far
Show Alli am sure people read the associated press on the titanic
So what about all this high-tech wizardry supposedly being used to spy on you & I right now by keeping track of each keystroke we type? Don't they have all of Rove's dirty little secrets stored somewhere, one letter at a time?
Rich Galen is a complete idiot. The difference between going after Clinton and Bush is night and day. They had to "make up" stuff about Clinton, while Dubya has broken many, many laws and continues to enjoy his life in the bubble.
jpbreeze - I agree totally! The Republicans spent years and years going after Clinton and homing in on small, insignificant ancient history as well as nitpicking details of his private life. It was incessant, prolonged, and vicious, not due to any real transgressions of Clinton's, but at least in part as a method of distraction from the real agenda of the neocons. There was a concerted effort to discredit any successes by the Democrats in general or the Clinton Administration in particular in order to bring the Republicans and arch-conservatives (a misnomer if there ever was one) to power. It pretty much worked.
This is a very different situation. The Bush cabal has pertetrated so many crimes it's impossible to catalog all of them in this forum. Rove is responsible for much of the horror going on all over the world including our own country. It's way past time for him to be held accountable.
"So what about all this high-tech wizardry supposedly being used to spy on you & I right now by keeping track of each keystroke we type? Don't they have all of Rove's dirty little secrets stored somewhere, one letter at a time?"--Buckycat
Yeah, but they're on the Republicans' payroll. Rove can tell the FBI, NSA, whomever, to wipe his drive and any subsequent servers his email might have traveled through. The White House surely is a small LAN with security protocols of which we lay-people have no awareness. They'd have to subpoena Rove's actual harddrives and/or the drives from any servers on the White House network.
Rove,s dreadful actions including his horrific slander reflect his loyalty to George Bush who bears the responsibility. Never forget the character assination of Max Cleland, a triple amputee Vietnm vet who was labelwd unpatriotic and even shown in a photo next to Bin Laden for sponsoring an inquiry into 9/11 which Bush opposed--and this is only one example.
The never ending scandels of this administration eclipse the Lewinsky scandel which led to an impeachment and are more significant than Watergate which brought down a presidency.
Much of the e-mail in question was not only sent on RNC accounts, it was sent on RNC furnished laptops and Blackberries, which lacked the security equipment that is used for secure communications within the administration. If any of the information that was transmitted was secret--and in the most secretive administration in history, how could it not be?--that would seem to be grounds for revocation of security clearances, without which these careless people can't effectively do their jobs even if they suddenly appeared to be able and willing to do so.
And, yes, it boggles the mind that anyone could conflate the present circumstances with those presented to the Republicans when Clinton was in office. Clinton was more or less tending to the nation's business competently, if not the way many of us would have wished. The job of Republicans was to shape legislation such that it tilted Clinton to the right when possible (and it turned out not to be a difficult task). But the job of Democrats, now, IS to hound the administration and stop it from its years of criminal and ineffective drift, graft, and compulsive deceit.
If the same standards were applied to the Bush cabal as were to Clinton, Rove, Cheney, Wolfowitz, and Bush would all be doing time right now. That's a fact.
Would there be enough space in Guantanamo to house these miscreants? Just wondering.
WE cant replace Bush admin. with anyone better, we are in a time of war. Our government has let us down with all the corruption and corporate acts of terror manipulation. To find a way out in this bureaucratic nightmare, to me, seems impossible, and still be able to keep the wheels turning? This "cabal" is in every spot we look from the resnublikkkans to the dumocrats, all the offices epa, energy task, force meat testing to the radio and tv, all the big industries. Subliminal ads are all over the place and everyone watches. Its coke or pepsi in everyones hand. Our 'minutemen' are now illegal and we hired blackwater? So what? Whats next? Trapped and unfocused, divided and marginalized, segregated.