Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- Is Enbridge Building a Secret Keystone Pipeline?
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Growing Toll of Iraqi Civilian Deaths
"The suffering that Iraqi men, women and children are enduring today is unbearable and unacceptable," the director of operations of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Pierre Kraehenbuehl, stated Wednesday on releasing a ICRC report on the situation in Iraq after four years of the US-led war. Entitled "Civilians Without Protection - The Ever-Worsening Humanitarian Crisis in Iraq," Mr. Kraehenbuehl added that the humanitarian situation is "affecting in one way or another, directly or indirectly, all Iraqis today."
Studies of this nature have been systematically rejected by the Bush and Blair administrations. When, in October 2006, a team of American and Iraqi epidemiologists estimated that 655,000 more people had died in Iraq since the beginning of the war than would have died if the invasion had not taken place, the British foreign secretary, Margaret Becket, stated that the figures, published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, were inaccurate. President Bush stated that the Lancet study was not a credible report.
In contrast, however, scientists at the UK's Department for International Development concluded that the study's methods were "tried and tested," and that the authors' approach, if anything, underestimated civilian mortality. That conclusion was supported by President Bush's own Iraq Study Group in indicating that violence in Iraq is markedly under-reported.
The new ICRC report lends added credibility to The Lancet report. Civilians, it says, many of them children, bear the brunt of relentless violence, while inadequate security conditions are disrupting the lives of millions of Iraqis. Food shortages have contributed to the rise in malnutrition; inadequate water, sewage and electricity infrastructure contribute to a decline in public health. Fuel shortages affecting power stations further aggravate the worsening crisis. Hospitals and primary healthcare centers lack supplies and are forced to rely on unreliable back-up generators,
It is estimated that some two million Iraqis are now displaced persons within their own country, while two more millions have are now refugees abroad. The Iraqi Red Crescent estimates that since February 2006, more than 100,000 families have been displaced. High among those fleeing the country are medical professionals and nurses; according to estimates published by the Iraqi Ministry of Health more than half of Iraq's doctors have left. With fewer personnel, the additional influx of civilian casualties in the hospitals places the system under inconceivable strain.
Despite all evidence, some political leaders continue to insist that the situation is improving, as though the brutal TV images of the war did not exist, as if it were a fantasy invented by evil spirits. The chasm between the people's view of reality and that of their leaders has rarely been greater.
The editor of The Lancet, Dr. Richard Horton, stated recently: "Our collective failure has been to take our political leaders at their word". Senator John McCain, speaking recently to cadets at the Virginia Military Institute, affirmed that to continue the war is, indeed, to pursue the right road. And, added McCain, one of the leading contenders for the Republican presidential nomination, "it is necessary and just." The above-mentioned facts should prove to him that it is neither.
Dr. César Chelala, an international public health consultant, is a foreign correspondent for the Middle East Times International (Australia).
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

10 Comments so far
Show AllI am a little troubled by the relentless focus on civilian deaths. Yes, Iraqi civilians are innocent victims of US/UK aggression, but ALL Iraqis who have been killed as a result of the invasion - cilivian and military - are innocent victims. Armed Iraqi insurgents who die while defending their country against US/UK aggression are also innocent victims. US/UK soldiers have no right to kill ANY Iraqis, whether they be civilian, military, armed or unarmed. The only right US/UK soldiers in Iraq have is the right to get out of Iraq.
Mark Marshall
Toronto
Many people have alleged that individuals in the Bush-Cheney administration and their associates may be considered to have particiapted in "war crimes."
The deaths of and terrible injuries to innocent Iraqi civilians, including children (not to mention US troops) are part of the result of the deceptions and manipulations by the Bush-Cheney gang.
The Bush-Cheney bunch don't seem to care about dead or injured US troops or their families. They don't seem to care about innocent Iraqis killed, injured and fleeing for their lives.
Hopefully, the American people and our ethical leaders (we have them somewhere) will start demonstrating honor and compassion in our activities around the world.
Strength and power without honor and compassion have grave limits in effectiveness and progress.
For more on this:
"Intelligence, psychology and human heart: All are needed for success in war and peace"
PopulistAmerica.com
March 31, 2007
http://www.populistamerica.com/intelligence_psychology_and_human_heart
MarkMarshall April 14th, 2007 12:42 pm
just in case this early into the commentary MarkMarshall's comment were missed - scroll back up - its the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. nothing can be added, nothing taken away
MarkMarshall, I agree completely. I do not need the word "innocent" placed before the fact that someone was murdered to see that a crime was committed; and I don't care any more about the us soldiers dying than I do the Iraqi's, so why don't we hear statistics about both, equally?
As I briefly argued on Juan Cole's blog today, what we are seeing--funding through our taxes--is the Iraqi Holocaust, a deliberate, bi-partisan policy of genocide that started under Bush I, continued unabated--indeed accelerated--under Clinton/Gore, and continues this minute.
Genocidal Holocaust is NOT too strong a term when several million have died and millions displaced/traumatized. The Jews experince in WW2 was in essence no diferent. Iraqis are mostly Arabs, and Arabs are Semites. So, we have another anti-Semitic Holocaust perpetrated by Western Powers, whose leaders deserve the same fate as the managers of the Jewish Holocaust.
the right wing media obscures the facts, and many brainwashed Americans getting their "news" from Fox or even CNN are CLUELESS as to the numbers, the pain, the breakdown of that nation, the intolerable cruelty of it all... a friend of mine said the word civilization is misplaced on the West and how it behaves. Gandhi agreed... "What do you think of Western civilization?" and he answered, "I think it would be a great idea!" Alas, when people THINK "God" is on their side, the tragedies they are capable of. "The Tragedy of the 20th century is that nothing any longer is perceived as such." People are inured to death, but more so, when they can pretend it's not happening. Remember the Phil Ochs song, "Look outside the window there's a woman being robbed, maybe we should call the cops and try to stop the pain... but Monopoly is so much fun, I'd hate to blow the game, and I'm sure it wouldn't interest... anybody, outside of a SMALL CIRCLE OF FRIENDS." Karma will eventually hold all to account, and ignorance of the law--whatsoever you do unto the least of these, you do unto me--is NOT cause for impunity.
It is amazing that people still question if life was better under Saddam or under this illegal occupation. There are people who still believe that Iraqis were poor or starving under Saddam. Just remember the plane loads of Indian, Sri Lankan , Filipino workers who were evacuated before the fireworks began. Not only did they earn well they were sending monies back home to support their families. But then whom will you believe fox/cnn or the facts?
It is quite disgusting to see how the Lancet study was trashed in a knee-jerk reaction and how the media followed along with "he-said, she-said" reporting.
As for the "It's good that Saddam is gone/dead" bromide -- please!
Even y'day, I heard this expert on Danish radio bloviate about "we had take him down because he was bad" followed by "but it's sad they did such a bad job". I had to turn off the radio, not so much as to keep from throwing up, I've got a strong stomach, but it's kind of wierd if the neighbors see me standing there cussing at the radio!
The U.S. invasion has just compounded the massive errors by previous imperialisms. But here we are: we can't go back and undo any of it, we just have to figure out where we can go from here. Peace in Iraq, whether as a single country or divided into three or more (a very bad idea, it seems to me, but possibly inevitable given the depth of hostility among Kurds and Sunni and Shiite Arabs and Turkomans)--how to achieve it? A first step is to get U.S. & U.K. troops out of there. Negotiated peace will take far more diplomatic skill and sensitivity than the U.S. neocons have so far demonstrated. A coalition force of foreign troops may indeed be needed to assist whatever government(s) emerge. But the first requirement would be NO U.S. or U.K. MILITARY PARTICIPATION. We've demonstrated our massive incompetence and united almost all Iraqis against us.
I think we have already entered into another era in history where we see the rise of naked aggression and fascism. The Bush-Cheney admin has spearheaded this campaign of total disrespect for national territorial integrity and genocide against innocent civilians. I am sure the Bush administration can easily be indicted for war crimes, use of brutal, uncivilized barbarian,immoral force for geopolitical gain. It is doing it swiftly before any challenge from countries like China or Russia can emerge. It is hoping to get cooperation from the Indians to counter the rise of this new alliance. If the Indians do so, they will commit suicide. India is no match for either China or Russia.
Recent developments in Bangladesh through the installation of fascist civil-military dictatorship backed by the US and UN caressed army is ominous for Bangladesh.Today's Pakistan incident exposes the brutal animal instincts within US foreign policy.
The US and British ambassadors were openly meddling in Bangladesh's politics.The NGOs Grameen Bank and BRAC, run by the donors, and the World Bank and IMF have wholeheartedy supported the junta to brutalize democracy in Bangladesh. Prafulla Patel of WB even openly supported the inhumane internment of the two former prime ministers and advocated the 'minus two' formula to cripple Bangladesh's democracy and economy. Consequently, an unelected, unconstitutional, undemocratic government had the audacity to sign deals for purchase of $12 billion worth of Boeings,and signing of PSCs for offshore blocks in the Bay of Bengal.The Irrawady delta explored and mapped by the Chinese, Russians and Indians have at least 10 times the reserve Bangladesh and India combined have. The Americans are planning to get a foothold in SE Asia following their debacle in Nepal. The monarchy is the last tool to put nails on the coffin of democracy. But it has backfired with the victory ofthe communists there. China now have played a very powerful role there to counter US attempts by the US ambassador, Mr.Moriarty to defeat the rebels militarily. Mr.Moriarty is now in Bangladesh to see that the US grip on SE Asia is kept alive by keeping her as a subservient state. Then they can make inroads into Burma to plunder it's riches.
But things are not that optismistic in reality. A badly bruised bear in the 90s which have recuperated slowly but surely and a sleeping dragon have quickly taken notice of the dangerous geopolitical nightmare in the making. The Bush admin have made the world one of the unsafest planet in he universe and a minor skirmish in future may herald thebegining of World War III and with it the end of planet earth. Only then Bush and company's greed for money and global natural resources will come to an end.