Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Top Wolfowitz Postings Went to Iraq War Backers
WASHINGTON - Of the top five outside international appointments made by embattled World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz during his nearly two-year tenure, three were senior political appointees of right-wing governments that provided strong backing for U.S. policy in Iraq.The latest appointment came just last month when former Jordanian Deputy Prime Minister Marwan Muasher was named senior vice president for external affairs.
Muasher served as King Abdullah's ambassador here in Washington in the run-up to the Iraq war in 2002 and reportedly played a key role in ensuring Amman's co-operation in the March 2003 invasion.
During and after the invasion, when he served first as foreign minister and then as deputy prime minister, he was considered among Washington's staunchest supporters in an increasingly hostile Arab world.
Muasher's appointment came nine months after Wolfowitz named former Spanish foreign minister Ana Palacio as the Bank's senior vice president and general counsel. As foreign minister, she was an outspoken proponent of the U.S.-led Iraq invasion, to which her government, led by former Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, contributed 1,500 troops.
Also in June 2006, Wolfowitz named former Salvadoran Finance Minister Juan Jose Daboub as one of the Bank's two managing directors. In addition to his financial post, Daboub served as chief of staff to former President Francisco Flores when, as a charter member of the U.S.-led "Coalition of the Willing", he sent nearly 400 Salvadoran combat troops to Iraq, more than any other developing country.
Wolfowitz is currently fending off growing calls, particularly from Bank staff, non-government organisations and a number of former senior Bank officials, for his resignation over charges that he improperly negotiated a promotion and compensation package for his romantic partner, career Bank staffer Shaha Riza, who was subsequently seconded to the U.S. State Department.
Wolfowitz, who became the Bank's president in June 2005, has long insisted that his own role as deputy defence secretary under U.S. President George W. Bush, in which he was a key architect of the Iraq war, would never influence his decisions at the Bank.
As recently as Thursday, as finance and development ministers began gathering here for the annual Spring Meetings of the Bank and its sister institution, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Wolfowitz again denied that his connection to the Iraq war has played any role in his work at the Bank and suggested that the calls by staff for him resign were motivated at least in part by anti-war sentiment.
"For people who disagree with things they associate with me in my previous job," he said, "I am not in my previous job."
But persistent efforts by Wolfowitz to recruit a new country manager for Iraq despite concerns over staff security there -- as well as the Bank's attempts last month to suppress reports about an incident in which a Bank employee was injured in Baghdad, apparently to avoid derailing his recruitment efforts -- have lent credence to critics' charges that he has been more than eager to line up the institution and its resources behind U.S. policy there.
The fact that Wolfowitz also took with him to the Bank several key right-wing Republican aides -- none with any development experience -- who had worked closely with him on Iraq-related issues while he was at the Pentagon also bolstered that impression.
There have been reports of elaborate off-the-record efforts on Wolfowitz's part, during his tenure at the Bank, to persuade prominent journalists that the administration's pre-war allegations of an operational link between Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda were indeed true.
It is in that context that Wolfowitz's appointments of non-U.S. individuals who were not already working for the Bank to top posts appear significant.
"I believe that Paul Wolfowitz has used his tenure in part to reward those governments and individuals who were particularly helpful to the U.S. in the Iraq War," said Steven Clemens, director of the American Strategy Programme of the New America Foundation, who has closely followed Wolfowitz's career on his much-read blog, www.thewashingtonnote.com.
"To me, that's a completely irresponsible approach to managing one of the world's most important economic development institutions," he added.
Since taking the reins, Wolfowitz has made five senior non-U.S. outside appointments at the Bank. In addition to Muasher, Palacio, and Daboub, they include Vincenzo La Via, a former Italian finance ministry official who serves as the Bank's chief financial officer, and Lars Thunell, a Swede who serves as executive vice president of the Bank's International Finance Corporation, a post for which the Bank president traditionally defers to the choice of the Bank's major European donors.
In contrast to the last two, Muasher, Palacio and Daboub were all political appointees in governments that strongly backed the Bush administration on Iraq and on other issues, as well.
Daboub was a senior member of the ruling right-wing ARENA party in El Salvador and effectively ran the country's economic policy from 1999 to 2004.
"He really was [then president Francisco] Flores' right-hand man," said Roberto Rubio, president of the Fundacion Nacional para Desarrollo in San Salvador, " and, as such, pursued the most orthodox economic policy in the country's history, closely tied to U.S. policies."
According to Rubio, he was also a frequent visitor to Washington, where he founded the Instituto America Libre to advocate free market policies. At a conference here in 2005, he called on Washington to "act more aggressively on the problem of security that South American populists represent to the United States and to other Latin American countries that have not fallen into leftist hands yet."
Palacio, an outspoken supporter of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, lost her position as foreign minister after the 2004 defeat of Aznar's Partido Popular in 2004. Before her appointment to the Bank, she repeatedly denounced the decision of Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero to withdraw Spanish forces from Iraq and praised the persistence of both Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair.
In an interview with the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute's magazine, American Enterprise, in late 2005, she accused Zapatero of "plung(ing) Spain into Third World politics" by allying it more closely with France and Germany than with Britain and the U.S.
As Jordan's ambassador here before the Gulf War and later as foreign minister, Muasher met with then-deputy defence secretary Wolfowitz on at least several occasions, according to the Pentagon's website.
Despite King Abdullah II's public criticism of the war, Washington found a "willing" -- if behind-the-scenes -- ally in Muasher. While Jordan, like other Arab countries, did not send troops to Iraq, it quietly provided intelligence and other critical support for the U.S. before and during the war. It has also helped train thousands of Iraqi security personnel and tightened control of its borders to prevent the infiltration of Sunni fighters after the war.
As deputy prime minister, Muashar was charged with implementing the country's "reform" agenda, a portfolio that required frequent contact with U.S. officials, including former deputy assistant secretary of state for Near East and South Asian Affairs Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney with whom Wolfowitz was closely allied during Bush's first term.
Washington increased its aid to Jordan by some 300 million dollars in 2003 to a total of 450 million dollars. In 2006, it received 500 million dollars split between economic and military assistance.
Jordan's benefits from the war included oil subsidies from Gulf States, substantial new U.S. aid, a booming real estate sector, and a growing Iraq-related trade and transport account -- and, apparently, the appointment of Muasher to the World Bank's vice presidency.
"It's not at all surprising given Wolfowitz' actions so far within the Bank and the Bush administration's propensity to reward allies and cronies," said Doug Hellinger, co-director of the Development GAP and a veteran Bank observer.
Copyright © 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service.



28 Comments so far
Show AllWithout a proper respect for the rule of law and a simple commitment to ordinary decency we will continue to put and keep people in influencial positions who have no business being there. We are all at fault and we are beginning to see how our lack of responsibility is affecting every aspect of life.
http://www.gpln.com/howiseeit.htm
Read "The Assasin's Gate" and "Imperial Life in the Emerald City" for an in-depth look at how Bush loyalists , without any knowledge or understanding of the Iraqi people, were appointed to positions of authority. And with no interest in collecting information or sharing it with experienced staffers; just following orders that would look good politically in the USA. It made me laugh and cry at the horrorific miscalculations that have led to so many deaths--both Americans and Iraqis. Billions spent and still no decent hospitals, electrical service, sanitation, and on and on. God help us all.
gpln:
The rule of law has been replaced by the rule of money. If one considers how long the IMF and World Bank have been in place and then acknowledge the fact that there are no fewer poor people in this world, it's clear to see that International Bankers act on behalf of their own greed. Hence, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
The first paragraph alone tells us we are not dealing with a "bank", but with another "Nation" intent on it's own profit. As Gail said above: "the rule of law has been replaced by the rule of money". We only have to look around us to see how we are being reduced to "consumers"....if we allow it.
hey i got an idea!
its simple
just say no to money!
And on and on t goes. Like some disease, the neo-cons are doing everything in their power to take control of everything it touches. It was no surprise to read that unqualified persons had been picked by Wolfowitz to positions at the World Bank.
It's simply amazing the tenacity of these people. What I want to know is: Who is really running this country? There is no doubt n my mind that an unelected, unspoken of, group is behind many things since the Reagan presidency. I realize that I must sound like some conspiracy nut, but there are simply too many coincidences to ignore the fact that we have no idea who is really making the decisions. We know who the foot soldiers are, but not those who are giving the orders.
There aren't two parties in power in our Nation's capitol. There is only one party. I won't deny that there are some elected representatives that are doing their best to serve the people. However, the odds are against them and their proposals have little chance of going far. So, it really is a one party state that we have today. For me, it's Dennis Kucinich. I don't care if his chances are slim to none of being elected. There is nobody else I can vote for.
Racketeering on a grand scale. RICO penalties are 20 years. They'll have to grant a mass pardon.
The World Bank is just another branch of the top 1%. It serves them. It can't be held to a standard that most of the populace of the planet believes should govern how organizations operate. It is an empire unto itself. The sooner the rest of us recognize our inherent servitude, the better.
hybridoma2001 April 14th, 2007 6:20 pm
What I want to know is: Who is really running this country?
When Baron M.S. Rothschild (Major European Banker) said, "give me control over a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws", he wasn't talking out of his ass.
It is the Federal Reserve Bank that sets interest rates and controls the daily supply of currency. All that's needed to effectively control a government is to have control over the nation's money supply and credit.
Having worked as a paralegal for a number of years, I was shocked to learn that many attorneys are not aware that the Federal Reserve Bank is a privately owned entity of which Congress has no oversight. Imagine allowing a privately owned business run a country with no governmental oversight. They apparently have also infiltrated the curriculum at laws schools!
Talk about total outrage! No wonder we're all getting screwed with interest rates on 1)mortgages (2 student loans (3 credit cards and the like.
Without proper oversight, the World Bank and IMF can do more harm than good.
Based on the level of interest the average American voter pays to what the World Bank does, I would say proper oversight is all but impossible for the World Bank.
Thus we (the US of A) should get rid of the World Bank entirely.
The Best Democracy Money Can Buy!
Stop shopping April 15 to April 22!
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/18320
ALOHA !!
GOVERNMENT IS ONLY AS HONEST AS ITS MONEY ...
Who agreed to fund the "neocon" agendas? The democratic members of Congress ... thats who!
Get rid of the two party aristocracy that has held a death grip on our rights and our money for over fifty years now! Vote out all Reps and Dems ...
Ya know, maybe Wolfie did the world a service by collecting a bunch of international neo-cons together in one place. Drawing them away from their respective countries where they might otherwise have done some serious damage.
Wolfowitz: What he did for Fallujah, he can do for the world.
Gail April. Thanks for the reply. I had no idea it was a private entity. I always thought it was part of the government. What you write makes complete sense. Who ever controls the money, controls basically everything.
I still say it goes way back to when the whites first came here and stole the land and killed off as many original people as thier murdering armies could.
You can not build ANYTHING GOOD FROM THAT KIND OF BEGINING EVER! Warmongers theifs liers crooks biggots have been running this racist contry from the very begining and as the years go by you people make heros out of them! And this clown wolfowitz like a good neo-con hangs off others suffering like the holocost pretending to care soo much all the while the bastard is robbing you and me as quickly as his money grubing can.
The reason I bring the last point up I have read on other sites including this one people ranting on and on about the isreali lobby in the usa and how it controls the goverment and it policies towards the middle east and quite frankly I think thats a pile of hogwash for people like wolfowitz are users they use people places and things as it suites them for thier own personal gain.
america put these fools in power in the first place and I think that is where the mistakes are in the first place. we get what we sow.
When will Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith and the rest of the neocons who apparently lied us into the invasion of Iraq be held accountable?
Phase two of the Congressional investigation into faked intelligence needs to get going.
Wolfowitz is one of the key players who should be called before Congressional committees. Some of his necon cronies are well known and some are behind the scenes.
They should all be looked at carefully regarding their roles in the invasion and occupation of Iraq and related matters. Take a look at:
"'Mistakes' or 'plans' in Iraq, War on Terror?"
PopulistAmerica.com
February 12, 2007
http://www.populistamerica.com/mistakes_or_plans_in_iraq_war_on_terror
- - -
"An urgent task for the new Congress: Conduct necessary inquiries and investigations properly"
PopulistAmerica.com
October 22, 2006
http://www.populistamerica.com/an_urgent_task_for_the_new_congress
Gail April wrote: .."the Federal Reserve Bank is a privately owned entity of which Congress has no oversight".
I was shocked when I read this, and did some further research. Your statement is not quite true, and I would advise against propagating such a generalist statement. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is an independent federal government agency (much like the CIA, NASA, NSF, EPA etc), and is made up of presidential appointees. The Board reports to the Senate, and is responsible for the formulation of monetary policy, as well as supervises and regulates the operations of the Federal Reserve Banks, and US banking system in general.
The Federal Reserve Banks are owned by private member banks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System
Countries which some of them are not really rich give monies to the World Bank for the purpose of helping nations in need. A romantic partner promoted, her high salary is being paid by the funds meant to help poor countries. Hello, am I missing something?
What is it that this woman exactly does to entitle her to the salary of $195,000 per annum? What is it that any of them do?
Yesterday someone told me, Sasha used to work for a high-class escort service in Virginia. Apparently FBI had inquired about Sasha at the particular escort agency. Has anyone heard anything about this?
Shane April 15th, 2007 5:18 pm
Shane: Did I not say that the Federal Reserve Bank was privately owned? Did you not arrive at the same conclusion after your research on wikipedia?
As far as Boards of Governors and Directors of Government agencies are concerned, they all report something to Congress at some point in time, usually when they're called in to explain a crisis that's taking place. Do you think they would have to call in these Directors and Governors to explain a crisis if they had oversight and information to the goings-on within these agencies? Are you aware that many of these agencies do not comply with requests made by Congress? They need only say two words (National Security) and Congress backs-off instead of using their subpoena powers.
If the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank is responsible for regulating monetary policy (lending), then why the hell are we now dealing with a subprime loan crisis and a student loan crisis?
"In a fierce contest to control the student loan market, the nation's banks and lenders have for years waged a successful campaign to limit a federal program that was intended to make borrowing less costly by having the government provide loans directly to students."
"The companies (banks) have offered money to universities to pull out of the federal direct loan program, which was championed by the Clinton administration. They went to court to keep the direct program from becoming more competitive. And they benefited from 'oversight so lax' that the Education Department's assistant inspector general in 2003 called for tightened regulation of lender dealings with universities." - by Jonathan D. Glater / Karen W. Arenson
Do you see where there might be a "conflict of interest" here where you have Federal Reserve Governors reporting to the federal government while they're regulating monetary lending policies through privately owned banks?
Are they regulating for the benefit of the federal government or for the private bankers?
If you can find a book that was written by Eustace Millins called: Secrets of the Federal Reserve, you will gain a greater history and understanding of this entity than you will from wikipedia. Mullins has a reputation of being an authority on the Federal Reserve. He traveled worldwide and researched government archives to investigate this industry.
Wolfowitz, another alumnus of the Bush Crime Syndicate.
An interesting video on the Federal Reserve Bank and what it's really all about: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm
Hmmmmmm...I think the real problem here is that Wolfie has been stuck on the same flavor of Kool Aid for much too long. He is seeming, er, rather "grapey!" And his tongue has turned purple!
Honestly, does any thinking person really take this man seriously???? He is a parody of himself!
Hmmm, Let's see, The World Bank if run by the right-wing richies basically
becomes a private entity (the Dem's) were out numbered terribly during this fiasco...AND now, The Military (Blackwater, etc.) has been privatized (it's one on one) now and there is no oversite there or the world bank, I'd say that
we are screwed unless we start demanding Law and Order and Accountability!
KEEP
READING.......
I GOT MY
BUTTONS MIXED
UP
I DO
APPOLOGIZE..
really sorry....
Yes, it kick-started during Regan, then Bush1 (Clinton caught with his pants down) and now baby-shrub, Wolfie has been in the game far too long to be considered honest-reliable-or- humanitarily influenced! Greed will eventually feed upon itselfand thus destroy itself, I just hope it's soon enough! We're paying for ALL OF IT...ALL MONEY AND NO ACCOUNTABILITY! The dollar is tanking,
our military is tanking and all is in the hands of not just the right-wing, these nuts are Fundamentalist-Evangelicals , they've wanted this "HOLY-WAR" for a very long time! What we are seeing is a rerun of the CRUSADES!
hybridoma2001 April 14th, 2007 6:20 pm
What I want to know is: Who is really running this country?
Your thoughts and remarks on this are well taken. I share many of them. In my search for answers I looked at the rise of the neo-cons, Vulcans, PNAC and began to see some of how it all began. But you are correct there is more. Conservatism as with the neo-con message has given way to authoritarianism and the doctrice world domination. Yikes!
Not only must Wolfowitz be fired...if a modicum of ethical conduct is demanded in practice of a professional [world] organization...but his paramour must be returned to her original status and pay or preferably fired too.
She is as guilty as he is in unethical acts. Just think of the precedent such acts would entail.
As much as the information provided in this article and others on the ethical behavior of the present World Bank President may be accurate, adscribing his senior personnel appointments to ideological affinity only is not. In the case of Ana Palacio, in addition to Spain's Foreign Affairs Minister she was the leading jurist on the European Parliament for many years, and has more qualifications for her job as World Bank's Chief Legal Counsel and Vicepresident than anybody I know.
Another part of the information in this article is also wrong and unfair. I was totally opposed to the invasion of Iraq, but to be fair, the Aznar Government did not contribute troops to the invasion but only for the peacekeeping mission after the occupation.
whatever happened to discussions about the industrial military complex and how Dwight Eisenhower forsaw the terrible truth about this war machine economy?
So, This is what soldiers are going over sea's to kill and be killed for.They should make an inquire into what they are dieng
for.
Why are we so shocked? Mr. Wolfowitz has 'fulfilled' his job just as his Master expected him to do. That is what the appointment by the Bush Admin. has asked him to do... and he was prepared for it for 20 years or more! It is so interesting to watch the great unravelling, sadly that it took so much carnage to bring it about.