EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama's Silence on Imus Alarms Some Blacks
WASHINGTON -- With the Rev. Al Sharpton leading calls Monday for radio host Don Imus to be fired over racially insensitive remarks, Senator Barack Obama's presidential campaign avoided the controversy throughout the day. Not until Monday evening, five days after Imus's comments were uttered and hours after CBS Radio and MSNBC announced a two-week suspension for the radio host, did Obama weigh in, saying in a statement: "The comments of Don Imus were divisive, hurtful, and offensive to Americans of all backgrounds." Obama did not address whether he thought Imus should be taken off the air.
The episode is the first test of how Obama -- who is of mixed-race background -- is handling the contentious issue of race in his presidential campaign. Even as polls have shown other Democrats attracting a large share of the black vote, Obama has steered clear of the kind of activism symbolized by Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson, who were both highly visible in the Imus episode but whose aggressiveness on race issues has alienated some white voters in the past.
But with Obama battling other Democrats -- most notably Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York -- for the support of black voters, the candidate's reticence on the Imus issue set off alarms yesterday among some black activists who are anxious to see him more forcefully push for racial justice.
Melissa Harris Lacewell, a professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, said Obama missed an opportunity to prove himself to blacks and white liberals who would have wanted Obama take the lead in denouncing Imus.
"This was so easy, and his unwillingness to touch it tells me this is going to be his third rail, and race never goes away in politics," Harris Lacewell said. "Black people want to love Barack. They're doing everything they can to love Barack. We want to believe that Barack is better than this. But they will turn on him."
The Obama campaign declined to comment yesterday on its handling of the issue. One adviser pointed out, however, that Obama issued a public comment before the other major Democratic candidates -- including Clinton and former senator John Edwards of North Carolina.
Obama represents a break with the presidential candidacies of forebears such as Sharpton, a Democratic presidential candidate in 2004, and Jackson, who ran in 1984 and 1988.
Obama is the son of a white mother and a black father from Kenya, and grew up in Hawaii and Indonesia. He is part of a generation too young to be shaped directly by the civil rights movement; he was 6 years old when Martin Luther King Jr. was slain in 1968.
Obama told CBS's "60 Minutes" earlier this year that he is rooted in the African-American community, but not defined by it.
In a closely watched speech last month in Selma, Ala., Obama declared that he was part of the "Joshua generation" -- likening himself to the Biblical successor to Moses who led the Jewish people into the promised land -- and thus located himself in the post-liberation generation.
While acknowledging debts to civil rights pioneers, Obama has made clear that he represents a different kind of politics, rooted deeply in coalition-building, not anger and outrage.
"He's cut from a different cloth, and that doesn't make him less black," said Joyce Ferriabough, a Boston-based Democratic consultant who is African-American. "His way of doing things is a lot more measured, less fiery, but that doesn't make him less effective. He needs to be the candidate of the people, and the people aren't just black."
Ron Walters, a former top campaign aide to Jackson and now a politics professor at the University of Maryland, said that if Obama took on a issue like Imus's comments, he could undercut his appeal to the broad electorate.
"There are people that are just waiting for him to jump out there in the crosshairs and be a race leader," Walters said. If Obama spoke out, "that would put him in a different role: a race leader. And that would pull back the covers for those who don't see race when they look at Barack Obama."
Yet Obama's promise to take up the mantle of past civil rights activists and his showing in the polls have not assuaged the concerns of some black leaders, including Sharpton, that Obama isn't sufficiently committed to the causes they hold dear. With Clinton also earning significant black support and her husband, the former president, still widely popular among black voters, those qualms among prominent blacks could have electoral consequences for Obama.
Sharpton has repeatedly said that Obama did not learn the lessons of the civil rights movement, including the value of bold stands and dramatic action.
"I agree with him that we are part of the Joshua generation, but Joshua came from the ranks of Moses to continue the struggle and not to abandon the struggle," Sharpton told the Washington Times last month. "Being a part of the Joshua generation is based on your work and not your age."
Though Jackson lined up behind Obama two weeks ago, Sharpton has pointedly refused to endorse Obama, sparking speculation that he will support Clinton -- his home-state senator -- instead. Sharpton has said he will not endorse any candidate until hearing more about their views on civil rights and other issues at his National Action Network convention next week in New York City.
Michael Eric Dyson, a University of Pennsylvania professor and author, said he supports Obama's campaign but questions why he did not speak up more forcefully about Imus. He added that the other presidential candidates had the same responsibility.
"Here's the point: Paying attention to the issues of race is an American concern," he said. "It looks as if he's being so careful and cautious not to ruffle the feathers of the mainstream that he may inadvertently raise the hackles of the black majority."
Harris Lacewell, the Princeton professor, said Obama's willingness to cede the spotlight to Sharpton on the Imus issue could leave such veteran activists more powerful in the black community -- and therefore tougher to win over.
Ferriabough, the Democratic consultant, said Obama's campaign is tied to the candidate's personal energy and charisma, rather than those who are declaring their support for him.
"Endorsements won't make or break this candidate," said Ferriabough, who said she has not committed to supporting any candidate but is leaning toward Obama.
"Obama doesn't need to go on the soapbox," Ferriabough said. "Others are doing it, led by Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. He's nipping at Hillary, so he's playing for real."
© Copyright 2007 Boston Globe
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

15 Comments so far
Show AllWhy is everyone so determined to prove or disprove how "black" Obama is or is not?
You want to look at racism? Look at making that an issue, each and every news media who does it all in the name of big bucks, distribution, publication, and every time we each and every one of us eat it up and give them, the mainstream news media, more reason to do this.
Obama, Clinton, and Edwards are, simply put, the main Democratic presidential contenders. Period.
Nothing more, or less. Exactly that.
Grow up, America, me included. Race is not the issue. Gender is not the issue. What they will or won't do, what they do or don't stand for - that's the issues, with them.
And they, in turn, have nothing to do with this small minded idiotic bigot - Imus, who for the same reasons as listed above ("...each and every news media who does it all in the name of big bucks, distribution, publication, and every time we each and every one of us eat it up and give them, the mainstream news media, more reason to do this...") Imus - a "shock jock" they say,....purely to make a buck, and we feed them to him, by listening, tolerating, and pretending that he has anything entertaining to say.
As far as that goes, what's this "shock jock" term mean anyway? How asinine and ignorant can we be of our own usage of words? There was a time when a "jock" meant, at least, some level of youthful young athletic manliness.
Why on earth would anyone call Imus, or his alleged peers, a "jock" of any kind? Have we no clearer vocabulary left at our disposal? Has our capability to express ourselves sunk that low?
To be honest, the worst thing Obama can do is reply on this whole Imus non-issue. For him, this is a no win situation because if he thinks Imus deserves another chance he will either be branded a "sell out" by those who want Imus's butt or he'll be called a "magical negro" by Hillary supporters and right wing race baiters. In addition, if Obama thinks that Imus should be 'fired', many people will feel that he only said it to appease the black vote, again making himself appear politically expedient. Obama is doing the right thing, there is just no value in sticking your neck out on a non-issue.
To Jocky something means that you can operate it. Thus "Disk Jockey." The word can also mean to be tricky or dishonest. I think it fits.
When Rush Limbaugh makes stupid statements, does everyone rush to "white" cnadidates and base their "whitness" on their remarks.
I'd like to know how many people in the real black community actual think Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton speak for them. They don't speak for me. I prefer Andrew Young or Julian Bond.
I guess most can agree that Imus is an idiot and deserves whatever. But I have to stop and wonder when all those who screamed, hollered, took to the streets and airwaves with slogans and signs crying for Imus' head on a platter....when are those same leaders of our moral certitude going to do the same amount in the same volume and scream for all those rappers and hip-hoppers who use 'bitches and hos' as two of the nicer terms in their 'music'????
Oh, I forgot it's cultural and besides..... that old bottom line $$$$$$
"when are those same leaders of our moral certitude going to do the same amount in the same volume and scream for all those rappers and hip-hoppers who use 'bitches and hos' as two of the nicer terms in their 'music'????"
There have been a lot of people within the black and hip-hop communities that have criticized that sort of thing.
I don't know what people want Obama to do. Beat up Imus? Anger isn't his style. And besides, he probably has a lot more on his mind than the Vodka-brained Imus.
But the whole "is Obama black enough?" thing is a joke. I'm a white guy who supports the idea of reparations. Does that make me "black"? Does "being white" equate with being against social and economic justice?
Imus is rapper who talks on a radio instead of saying the same thing in rhyme on record tracks. In the black rap community this sort of this is normal. In fact male and female rappers who describe women in even worse terms are lionized mainly in the black community as well by others. Why this double standard? Why not just put a disclaimer on Imus show like they do on rap records and get on. More over what sort of a message are we sending the Iraqis who are looking for basic freedoms like freedom of expression enjoyed by their liberators. What was the liberation all about if not for freedom and liberty. Obama must steer clear of this non-controversy.
Oh geez.............leave Obama alone! We can really start to worry if he finds a Tawanda Brawley in a trash can and makes that a part of his campaign!!!!! This guy really seems to be a grown up, and has made it clear where he stands on racial equality and respect.
Problem is:
Obama is the poster child of an empty suit and Hillary ain't nothing but a somewhat conventional conservative Republican triangulating with Neo-Cons and peddling Corporate backing when not bullying Dem party honchos.
Obama is oily slick, green, lacks fire, depth of charecter and meaning. Who is he and what does he stand for- and who will he not capitulate to as a result?
There ain't no fool like an old fool--and Imus is an offensive, ignorant, stupid old fuck who should be run out of town with the lot of stupid white men who use their positions to allow and accept this kind of gross casual remark as nothing more than good clean fun. He needs to get his ass kicked-because it ISN"T THE FIRST TIME or else we indicate that we continue to accept his idle utterings as completely acceptible.
It is not acceptible- unless you want to continue stupid white men--or women like Hillary, who model themselves as stupid white men (why would she be anything any woman would want to promote as representitive of women?)to run the show. Obama is meaningless.
corporate media wins again...they have everyone at one another's throat with the desired effect that no one notices that neither obama or clinton is free of corporate taint
There will be other shock jocks to take his place.
But this is the kind of thing that irritates people. Why should everyone agree to the same thing just because they are of 1 race. It may be that Obama does not even know who Imus is-I didn't. I have long tuned out trash radio such as Stern and listen to educational radio.
Imus should enjoy increased popularity such as Iverson and other rappers who break the law and carry guns.
It is o.k if this person wants to make fun of politicans or movie stars. I think he was wrong to pick on girls going to college. If I were the parent I would not be pleased.
Why is is everytime an old white man makes an ignorant statement the tired ass argument gets trotted out about "they do it too"...This isn't about "THEM", it's about a dried up old fool spewing hatred and negativity at 7am on a nationally syndicated "news" station. I've never heard Chris Rock on msnbc in the morning supposedly giving political commentary, so please bury that tired ass argument already.
How do we know Imus is a racist? Lessee, perhaps it was the time he chuckled gleefully while his producer called the Williams sisters "animals" or maybe the time he called Palestinians "filthy animals", conversly, I've never heard him refer to anyone WHITE as an animal or a ho, have you? Things that make you say HMMMMMMMMM
Now let's break down the reasoning for his feeling the need to add the words "nappy headed" after his cohort called them a "rough bunch of hos". Ho's wasn't enough? Perhaps he felt the need to hilight only the black players on the team? After all, wouldn't want to offend the white girls on the team I suppose...
This is a reply to suggestion by "kalia" that this is a freedom of speech issue: only the government can censure; the people can express their freedom of speech by protesting and, yes, boycotting any person, regardless if they're an employee of a public or private company, to pressure them to change. Imus did use clear-cut hate speech on public airwaves, which is against federal regulations that the FCC has failed to enforce. His freedom of speech does not require a radio show since it is a damn privilege. He can still rant and rave all he wants, just as the vast majority of us can, in spite of not having a radio show, or a recording contract for that matter. Your attempt to justify the silence of opposition by claiming the doublespeak of "freedom of speech" is outrageous: freedom of speech is not freedom from public criticism.
Oh, and the double standard excuse fails on two counts: numerous blacks, especially young black women, have railed against the misogyny of rap lyrics and videos for years and have failed to be heard b/c they are not the industry's base (young white men are); and even if the vast majority of blacks used derogatory slurs to attack black women and girls bigotry is not excusable, let alone does their use excuse others to engage in said bigotry.
The blacks will turn on Obama if he doesn't tow the black line? You bet they will. They love to beat up their own. That's how the slaves got here from Africa in the first place. But old Jesse and Albey won't admit that crap. It's get whitey and hang him from the tree time. Get that mob together and let's have us a riot. Them black boys gotta get over it and start acting like they have half a brain in those coconuts.
Boots said "Them black boys gotta get over it and start acting like they have half a brain in those coconuts"
Is that EEEEEEEEEEVEN English? Perhaps you should change your name to "jack" boots, it would certainly be more fitting with your philosophies. Another dried up old white man feeling sorry for himself...PATHETIC