EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Insider's Book Decries U.S. 'Ignorance' on Iraq
NEW YORK - In a rueful reflection on what might have been, an Iraqi government insider details in 500 pages the U.S. occupation's "shocking" mismanagement of his country - a performance so bad, he writes, that by 2007 Iraqis had "turned their backs on their would-be liberators.""The corroded and corrupt state of Saddam was replaced by the corroded, inefficient, incompetent and corrupt state of the new order," Ali Allawi concludes in The Occupation of Iraq, newly published by Yale University Press.
Allawi writes with authority as a member of that "new order," having served as Iraq's trade, defence and finance minister at various times since 2003. As a former academic, at Oxford University before the U.S.-British invasion of Iraq, he also writes with unusual detachment.
The U.S.- and British-educated engineer and financier is the first senior Iraqi official to look back at book length on his country's four-year ordeal. It's an unsparing look at failures both American and Iraqi, an account in which the word "ignorance" crops up repeatedly.
First came the "monumental ignorance" of those in Washington pushing for war in 2002 without "the faintest idea" of Iraq's realities.
"More perceptive people knew instinctively that the invasion of Iraq would open up the great fissures in Iraqi society," he writes.
What followed was the "rank amateurism and swaggering arrogance" of the occupation, under Paul Bremer's Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), which took big steps with little consultation with Iraqis, steps Allawi and many others see as blunders.
Among them:
- The Americans disbanded Iraq's army, which Allawi said could have helped quell a rising insurgency in 2003. Instead, hundreds of thousands of demobilized, angry men became a recruiting pool for the resistance.
- Purging tens of thousands of members of toppled president Saddam Hussein's Baath party - from government, school faculties and elsewhere - left Iraq short on experienced hands at a crucial time.
- An order consolidating decentralized bank accounts at the Finance Ministry bogged down operations of Iraq's many state-owned enterprises.
- The CPA's focus on private enterprise allowed the "commercial gangs" of Saddam's day to monopolize business.
- Its free-trade policy allowed looted Iraqi capital equipment to be spirited away across borders.
- The CPA perpetuated Saddam's fuel subsidies, selling gasoline at giveaway prices and draining the budget.
Bremer, who wrote his own account of his time in Baghdad, contended his authority was undermined by "micromanagement" from Washington, where he thought officials in the administration tried ``to set me up as a fall guy" for problems in Iraq.
Though U.S. generals in Iraq repeatedly asked the administration to reinstate dismissed officers from Saddam's army, Bremer recounted in his book "My Year in Iraq," they were consistently refused at the highest levels.
In the end, however, senior U.S. Defence Department officials sought to distance themselves from the decision to disband the old Iraqi army, and it became "etched into America's consciousness" that it was Bremer who "had made a grave error in demobilizing the Iraqi forces," he wrote.
Although Allawi, a cousin of Ayad Allawi, Iraq's prime minister in 2004, is a member of a secularist Shiite Muslim political grouping, his well-researched book betrays little partisanship.
On U.S. reconstruction failures - in electricity, health care and other areas documented by Washington's own auditors - Allawi writes that the Americans' "insipid retelling of success stories" merely hid "the huge black hole that lay underneath."
For their part, U.S. officials have often largely blamed Iraq's explosive violence for the failures of reconstruction and poor governance.
The author has been instrumental since 2005 in publicizing extensive corruption within Iraq's "new order," including a US$800-million Defence Ministry scandal. Under Saddam, he writes, the secret police kept would-be plunderers in check better than the U.S. occupiers have done.
As 2007 began, Allawi concludes, "America's only allies in Iraq were those who sought to manipulate the great power to their narrow advantage. It might have been otherwise."
© 2007 The Associated Press.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

18 Comments so far
Show AllThe bush "surge" is just adding more paint on top of a rotting, termite infested shack. And like any stupid do it yourselfer, he's sold his wife on what a great job he's done, now he can go back to his ball game. Time is not on bush's side. He'll be known as the most incompetent, arrogant, stubborn, a-hole of a president - ever.
What Mr. Allawi fails to point out is the US hijackers' intent in the first place. Allowing and even creating chaos in Iraq serve the American administration's purpose. Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney came to office with a real discontent for government. Their sole motivating factor is to profit from their illegaly acquired positions. The longer the violence continues, the longer they will have an excuse for staying in Iraq. It is irrelevant that they are the problem. While congress debates how many more trillions of dollars to appropriate, the dis-adminstration only debates how to steal those funds and who gets them. With the fist 1.2 trillion dollars, body armor was not felt to be a priority. Now that congress is threatening to withhold funds, that armor and other needs of the troops is being touted as necessary. Blackhawk and other mercenary companies are spared no expense, and not surprisingly, spared all accountability. The average civilian mercenary makes 30 times what the average US soldier makes. Haliburton charges for laundry and meals, an oil and energy company, who is so patriotic, it has become the military's maid service, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars. Not to mention the leaked truth aout over billing. Fifteen pallets of hundred dollar bills have gone unaccounted for. The "new" Iraqi government is poised to release the oil rights to US corporations. The money flows in to the neo-con criminals at unprecedented levels, and we call this operation a failure? Please.
Every aspect of this war was a crime under international law which was put in place since WWII sponsored by the United States:
1. Planning the war was a crime against peace.
2. Using depleted uranium is a crime against humanity.
3. And almost every aspect of implementing the war was and is a war crime.
In addition much of the conduct of the war are national crimes as well.
And almost to a person, the Republicans supported this administration in all of these crimes, and Democrats closed their eyes and enabled these crimes and criminals to persist.
And we citizens still plan on voting some of these people into office again next year which is one way of condoning all of it.
Mark A. Goldman
http://www.gpln.com/acceptingtreason.htm
http://www.gpln.com/dyingintheheart.htm
commondreams is chock-full of whining progressive bloggers who are long on truth and short on resolve. All but a few soldiers,sailorsmarines...serving and waiting to serve in Iraq are long on the rote-learned and nauseatingly repeated " I love country and my buddies ..."and short on the true guts it takes to be an Ehren Watada , Jonathan Hutto , the latest addition of Mike Ergo and the seventeen hundred signers of the Appeal for Redress.
Even the deserved-to-be darling of CodePink and Gold Star Families... Cindy Sheehan has yet to my knowledge publicly encouraged servicemen at home and "abroad" to follow Watada. Even commondreams has forgotten Watada.How soon will even progressive journalists forget Mike Ergo
. Both of them should be as famous as Charles Lindbergh.
Methinks Iève hit a raw nerve : It is ALL-American to speak out against the war : it is unforgivably UN-American to advocate desertion even if the occupation is illegal with reference to the Constitution , Geneva Conventions , International Court of Justice and the UN Charter all of which the US government is signatory to.
America was started by men and women who as British citizens defied and broke British laws.The laws were deemed unconstitutional even before there was a Constitution . How is that for being proactive.
Every American schoolchild is taught to revere the wisdom and tenacity of Paine,Jefferson,Madison,Franklin
They were not satisfied with just neutral desertion that now would end the present occupation ; they became the adversary.
In closing I challenge all progressive journalists to strive to be first to encourage servicemen to desert . Any thing less bold than this and it is nothing but preaching to the converted.
I was at ground zero on 9/11/2001. I was also against going into Iraq in the first place. I look to WWII for something similar. When Hitler invaded the USSR, the people initially regarded him as a liberator. Instead of accepting the people's help, he initiated a reign of terror that united the country behind Stalin, of all people.
I have a feeling that Ronald White will be put in hs palce as more posts are being added to this thread. What have YOU done Ronald? Attended any rallies? Been arrested? Protested in any way at all? If you have, I sure would like to hear about it. Words come cheap, and their's nothing wrong with people of like mind and opinion discussing what more we can do. Believe me, most everything we have talked about has aleady been tried, but the media continues to ignore these protests. Would you support a national strike or boycott? Please let us who whine so much know your thoughts.
By the way, I didn't read anything about the right wing whiners who spout their hate over the public airwaves. Are they allowed to do this but for some reason we aren't?
Scott Ritter should read this. Maybe he could explain the history of Islam to Mr. Allawi. After all, if Allawi had read Ritter's last opinion piece, then he would speak with authority. God bless Scott Ritter, but that "clash of civilizations" nonsense was way out of character.
Allawi analysis is a welcome and useful departure from the cartoonish nonsense we have been fed for so long.
Dude... It's not our soldiers' job to stop this war. They each swore an oath at enlistment to, "defend the constitution and obey the orders of superior officers".
That oath is a serious sacrifice of personal autonomy. I appreciate and honor all those who have given it to their country.
It's our responsibility - those of us who have not taken the oath - to protect those who have from expolitation by our leaders. We have failed our troops - badly.
I applaud Erin Watada's courage for challenging the legality of his orders. I support any individual soldier who finds that their orders have become a violation of conscience. But don't ask them to to our job for us.
How would you feel about a coup 'de tat by the Joint Chiefs to remove Bush and Cheney from office? Would the end of the war in Iraq be worth such an extreme move? Could there be any unintended consequences? Personally, I'd rather that the generals stay out of politics... and the privates too.
Grassroots activism will end this war, and sooner than you think. It's one thing to write a letter to your Congressman, it's quite another to send him a petition denouncing the occupation with 1000 names on it. Get to work.
I don't know if there has ever been such an oath as jjohnjj describes. When I joined the U.S. Navy in 1968, I took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. period. period. period. I was trained not to obey illegal orders. I did not surrrender any freedom of speech and marched in at least one protest against the War in Vietnam in Washington D. C. while on active duty.
Ronald White. I agree with jjohnjj that it isn't the troop's job to end this. Cindy Sheehan has never encouraged the troops to stop fighting because once they join the military, they become the property of the US government. They have some rights, such as to not follow illegal orders, but most of the children fighting over there have a strong sense of duty to their fellow servicemen as well as their country. Also, many have been lied to for so long that they don't know what the truth is anymore.
You referred to the American Revolution being fought by Bitish citizens. They were not British citizens. They were colonists living in the British colonies. Does taxation without representation ring a bell?
Hybridoma, I wouldn't go too ballistic over Ronald White's blast. Everyone grows impatient over the lack of progress now and then. When you see an injustice you want it to stop and change NOW, yesterday even. You can't blame someone for thinking we've lost our revolutionary fervor. For Ronald, however, I would caution that the sword cuts both ways. Mao thought China had lost the revolutionary fervor and launched the Cultural Revolution and Red Guards and killed tens of thousands of citizens. It's the eternal balance (or imbalance) between dynamism and stability, which can allow malignancies like Bush, et al. I'll admit, now may perhaps be the time for extreme motivation. I don't think our country can survive many more like Bush. At least apply some discrimination, recognize friend for friend, even if we don't agree on tactic.
For me, I think there were grandmas baking cookies for the Minutemen who were just as creditable for the Revolution as musket-bearers. Consider that.
lpenek: Thanks for the needed reminder. My excuse is that those of us who are progressive thinkers are constantly villified in the media, and yet all the mistakes which have been made have been by those very same people who critisise people who choose to look at an issue from more than one side.
A am guilty of not thinking but, as our loveable president says, I used my gut feelings. I will apologose to Ronald White now.
lpenek: Thanks for the needed reminder. My excuse is that those of us who are progressive thinkers are constantly villified by the media, and yet all the mistakes which have been made have been by those very same people who critisise people who choose to look at an issue from more than one side.
A am guilty of not thinking but, as our great president says, "I used my gut feelings." I will apologise to Ronald White now.
Ronald White. I was given a wake up call by one of the other bloggers here about my responses to you. I want to say I'm sorry for responding so harshly. My only excuse is that this is a place where progressive thinkers can share ideas and experiences. What made me upset were the opening lines about whining. Yes, we do whine a lot. And yes, we are preaching to the choir in many instances.
I share your views about drastic, enormous demostrations to catch someone's attention. I also wrote about Watada dropping off the radar screen. He is truly a hero. We probably share many things. Again, I'm sorry for directing my anger for the mainstream media at you.
Hi Drones,
Replace ignorance with Evil
As someone who served in and retired from the military I must take issue with Ronald White's stand. The military must be subservient to the political authority. That is what the oath is all about. That is why we swore to "protect and defend the constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign or domestic". To do anything else is to become another junta-riddled, "Banana Republic".
To violate one's oath must be an intensely personal pain, far outweighing any outer punishment and therefore meriting privacy and protection. No one should be encouraged to inflict such an outcome on themselves. It is the same sort of evil manipulation used to turn kids into suicide bombers.
This is a political problem, requiring a political solution. Since I don't want our military involved in politics, I have been doing my level best in conversation, letters to the editor, and other forums such as this, to persuade and educate - To bring to light the travesties inflicted upon this nation by its current leadership.
Please respect all of our military people. Ignore the solution advocated by this misguided individual.
You all should realize Israel's need of the 14 permanent US military bases in Iraq...better a gentile death than an MOT...in doing so many of the US government's actions (including the votes of members of Congress) will be understandable...
paschn, by drones do you mean:
In nature:
Drone (bee), a male bee
A male wasp
A male ant
Or in vehicles:
A pilotless airplane (drone), often used for target practice or surveillance
A remotely operated vehicle (ROV), used for mine clearing or underwater exploration
Or in fiction:
A member of the Drones Club in P. G. Wodehouse's novels
A humanoid that has been assimilated by the Borg in the fictional Star Trek universe
Drone (Voyager episode), an episode of Star Trek: Voyager
Drone Weapon, similar to a guided missile, in the Stargate universe
Three robotic helpers in the movie Silent Running, named Huey, Dewey and Louie
In the novel The Traveller, the term drones describes a class of citizens that have become exhausted
Detective Drone, the hero of Victorian crime stories
A Zerg worker unit in Starcraft
or in music:
Drone (music), a continuous note or chord
The part of various musical instruments (such as the bagpipe) that produce the drone sound
A bumbass, a folk instrument sometimes called a drone
Drone music, a music style or genre related to background music and ambient music
Drone Records, a record label?
And by ignorance, what precisely do you mean? Ignorance is a lack of knowledge. Ignorance is also the state of being ignorant or uninformed. Another definition states that ignorance is the choice to not act or behave in accordance with regard to certain information in order to suit ones own needs or beliefs. Or do you mean willful ignorance, which is a bad faith decision to avoid becoming informed about something so as to avoid having to make undesirable decisions that such information might prompt.
Finally, evil. The following is a direct qoute from Wikipedia: In religion and ethics, evil refers to the morally objectionable aspects of the behaviour and reasoning of human beings — those which are deliberately void of conscience, and show a wanton penchant for destruction. Evil is sometimes defined as the absence of a good which could and should be present; the absence of which is a void in what should be. In most cultures, the words are used to describe acts, thoughts, and ideas which are thought to (either directly or causally) bring about suffering and death — the opposite of goodness, which itself refers to aspects which are life-affirming, peaceful, and constructive.
Perhaps evil is best represented in the human situation in the form of unprovoked hatred against and coupled with an aggressive impulse to cause harm to another person or group (ie. sadism). Such hatred can be aroused from within the individual or group through jealousy, wrong teachings or due to unexplained extra-personal forces.
It's a shame you can't speak in full sentences, but that's OK, our president can't either. He does form longer chains of words than you do, though. It would be helpful to know just what you are trying to say.