EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Edward Snowden: Saving Us from the United Stasi of America
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- The Judicial Lynching of Bradley Manning
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
Popular content
Today's Top News
Media Watchdog Aims to Expose Flaws of Cable News
JEFF Cohen likes to say he's been to the belly of the beast and lived to talk about it.In fact, the Saugerties resident has written a book about the experience: "Cable News Confidential - My Misadventures in Corporate Media."
Having received paychecks from CNN, Fox News and MSNBC over the last two decades, Cohen has found a lot to critique about the business.
Cohen doesn't claim to be disillusioned with the corporate media, but only because he never had illusions. He founded the group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting in 1986 and entered the fray with a heavy dose of skepticism as he appeared on CNN and Fox News as a political pundit. But he said the flaws were made abundantly clear during the nine months he worked for MSNBC leading up to the Iraq war.
"Every mainstream news outlet or national network had a choice: act journalistically and skeptically or give Bush a free pass," he said. "Most chose to give him a pass."
Cohen, who used to co-write a column that was carried in the Freeman, said there are a couple of culprits for the media's missing-in-action status before the war. First, he cites changes by the Federal Communications Commission that allowed media ownership to be consolidated to a handful of corporate owners, including General Electric, AOL Time Warner, Disney and Viacom. Fear following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, was another big factor.
Television news was something that stations used to do at a loss as a public service, Cohen said. Now, corporations aim to make a profit from it.
"In the '60s and '70s, TV news wasn't great, but it was serious," said Cohen, 55.
True investigative reporting comes with too many risks to be profitable, Cohen said. So instead of true journalism, the major outlets now focus on a formula to hook viewers on a soap opera that keeps them watching. The recent death of former Playboy Playmate Anna Nicole Smith was a perfect example, providing weeks of coverage that was cheap and came with little to no risk, he said.
In the introduction to his book (which is published by PoliPointPress and retails for $14.95), Cohen hypothesizes that cable news can be broken down into proven Hollywood genres: The O.J. Simpson trial was a lurid crime drama, the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky scandal was a sex comedy, stories about the Beltway sniper attacks that killed 10 people in October 2002 were a suspense thriller. And there's also war.
"Those stories can't get you into trouble, can't lose you sponsors," Cohen said.
Partly for the sake of sponsors, networks often load up on right-wing pundits because they advocate big business, and shun far-left pundits, even on supposedly liberal stations like CNN, Cohen said. He said the problem with shows like CNN's "Crossfire" is that the debates are never a true conservative-liberal debate but a conservative-moderate debate.
"You're not allowed in unless you're within the corporate spectrum," he said.
Cohen said the off-balance debate structure was especially evident during the build-up to the Iraq war when almost all of the pundits advocated for the war and few spoke against it.
This utter lack of balance, he said, has driven independent viewers to seek their news on Comedy Central from the likes of Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert. Cohen thinks that says something about the cable media.
Cohen said he tried to end his book on an optimistic note. In a perfect world, Cohen said, he would have continued as a TV pundit. But the state of the media won't allow it. So, for now, he is in the midst of a tour to support his book and writing columns for his Web site, jeffcohen.org.
Cohen finds solace in the fact that more people are abandoning cable news for more reputable content at the British Broadcasting Co. and such Web sites as commondreams.org. But without radical restructuring, cable news may be beyond saving, he said.
"I say turn it off," Cohen said. "Turn off TV."
©2007 Daily Freeman
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



9 Comments so far
Show Allturn off monopoly media... turn on digital media...
I really appreciate Common Dreams...I read news and facts that I read nowhere else...I am aware that much of the news we read and see is "managed". I have read that (1) the "Iraqi" army helping in Bagdad speaks little arabic because they are mainly Kurds with almost no sunni or shiite members. (2) the big fear is that the Shiites will become so irritated by these Kurdish soldiers that instead of a two way civil war there will be a three way one. It is possible that neither of the above facts are true but if they are true there is magnificent information management going on in the USA at this time!!!!
Good Luck !
I think Jeff Cohen and Media Watch and other journalists who have tried to wake up America have been successful at it, but we need constant reminders to stay awake.
Keeping away from TV is a great idea for all of us.
Meanwhile, we have to bar corporations from any participation in our elections -- and certainly get back to paper ballots.
Was Jeff Cohen predicting anything about the '08 campaigns and coverage which has already begun.
Can the corporations repeat the inane and meaningless coverage of past elections once again?
Will I be whipped if I still turn on "NOW" with David Brancachio? How about we clean up PBS and get some real resources going their for some real journalism?
Our household watches local news network for what's going on in Hawaii (the state); we watch NBC national news occasionally just for a bell weather with a big helping of salt. It's Countdown with Keith Olbermann daily, but recorded on DVR so we can skip both commercials and the stupid stuff -- like American Idol "news," 99% of Anna Nicole Smith, and 99.9% of Britney/KFed,etc. Rest of our news comes from internet sites and, of course, Daily Show for its comic relief. So advertisers are wasting their money, and the networks their time when they try to package news into what is clearly not exactly representative of what is going on in the world. The internet has provided everyone the opportunity to graze news from everywhere in the world, not only BBC, and most especially not US media.
"act journalistically and skeptically or give Bush a free pass"
Neither of these seem very developed. Though real skepticsm is nuanced and a free pass isn't, in the media they've become true opposites. Skepticism becomes nothing but "nope, ain't buying it" directed at Bush just because he's Bush as much as giving Bush "a free pass" has meant near 100% media stenography for Bush.
I wish media types like Cohen would advocate some way to get at the truth that is more than just the posturing we've see on the right and left equally.
Good morning everyone,
I believe that Neil Postman put it best when he wrote the following from his book,"Amusing Ourselves to Death,"
"Tyrants of all varieties have always known about the value of providing the masses with amusements as a means of pacifying discontent. But most of them could not have even hoped for a situation in which the masses would ignore that which does not amuse. That is why tyrants have always relied, and still do, on censorship. Censorship, after all, is the tribute tyrants pay to the assumption that a public knows the difference between serious discourse and entertainment-and CARES. How delighted would be all kings, czars and fuhrers of the past (and commissars of the present) to know that censorship is not a necessity when all political discourse takes the form of a jest."
Cohen makes a good point. We can turn off the TV and watch selectively online. Of course, that applies to the right too. We seem to watch mostly what confirms our ideas. Selective watching of programs could be polarizing, but if the truth makes us free, liars stand to lose when we are given choice.