Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Code Pink Dogs Clinton on 2008 Trail
An anti-war group, Code Pink, is hounding Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) at almost every stop she makes on the campaign trail, hitting her again yesterday as she joined other candidates in seeking a union endorsement.
Standing in front of the Capitol Hill Hyatt Regency, the group made its presence known, inviting a sea of union members from the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers to "go back downstairs and kiss Hillary's a--."
While the group of laborers, enjoying cigarettes between speakers at the Communications Workers of America (CWA) forum, looked on with bemused interest, the protesters sang songs and waved signs advising Clinton not to "buy Bush's war."
Although they rarely show up at an event in large numbers, the pink-clad protesters do make their presence known with persistence and intensity.
As The Hill reported last week, former President Bill Clinton all but acknowledged his wife's glaring vulnerabilities — stemming from her vote for the Iraq war authorization in 2002 — by offering an animated and full-throated defense of her decision.
That vote and her refusal to apologize for it, combined with continued votes for the war-funding bill, has spurred the anti-war crowd to make itself a thorn in Sen. Clinton's side at most every campaign event.
While the crowd at the CWA forum repeatedly rewarded Clinton's Tuesday morning speech with standing ovations, Code Pink's presence was noticed and mentioned by the labor brass present.
"We don't need that to be the focus of the news today," CWA's secretary-treasurer, Barbara Easterling, told the group.
One of Code Pink's co-founders, Gael Murphy, said the group has been following Clinton for almost two years and will continue to do so until she introduces legislation to bring American soldiers home from Iraq. Murphy said it was likely the group would protest Clinton and other candidates at this morning's forum sponsored by the Building and Construction Trades Department of the AFL-CIO.
"We think it's important to put pressure on her as one of the most important politicians in the United States," Murphy said. Murphy said not even an apology for the 2002 vote, like the one rival candidate and former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) has given, would appease the group.
"She's welcome to apologize, and it would be great to hear her apologize," Murphy said, adding that the group would only be satisfied with a candidate who will "sincerely demonstrate" his or her commitment to ending "the occupation" of Iraq.
Murphy said the group has been targeting a number of candidates, including Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), at whose Chicago field office it has been conducting weekly sit-ins.
But Clinton's front-runner status has made her a marked woman for anti-war candidates.
Clinton's campaign did not return phone calls from The Hill Tuesday, but President Clinton hardly was shy in his wife's defense last week, questioning the fairness of media reporting on Sen. Clinton's votes.
"It's just not fair to say that people who voted for the resolution wanted war," the former president said last week.
Murphy said this week's vote on supplemental funding for the Iraq war is an "opportunity" for Clinton to start making her way back into the group's good graces.
© 2007 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.



19 Comments so far
Show AllAs a 'Neocon/Corporatist' there is much more to protest Candidate Clinton about then her 'War' vote, Check her voting record closely.
.................. A KNESAL
WTG Code Pink!! Keep on Hounding her !! I am also a Proud and Outstanding Member ! I just QUIT NOW-the National Organization for Women for thier endorsement of Hillary!!! Hillary in My opinion does NOT represent Your average day Woman, Mother, and Grandma, and SHE does Not have my best interests at heart.. I am doing everything in my power to see that SHE is Not elected... Myrna-grannyfromwisconsin
They certainly won't have to "DOG" one candidate: Kucinich!!!
To learn more about CODEPINK's efforts to stop the war or bird-dogging of Hillary, visit www.dontbuybushswar.org and www.listenhillary.org
What are we going to do if the Dem's put her on the ticket for Prez in '08? Would Kucinich run as an independent? How about Gore/Kucinich? Hillary should not set foot in the White House ever again! Don't let that happen! PLEASE!
Rebel Farmer:
You should have said Kucinich/Gore--after all Al has all that senate experience and 8 years already as VP. 8o)). From Kucinich's stand point he really needs Nader as assassination insurance because Ralph is about the only person "they" hate more than him.
I don't think Gore will come out of retirement for a second seat position. Therefore, I would propose a Gore/Kucinich ticket. WOW! all that experience, populism, and consideration of "We The People"! Could this country stand a REAL DEMOCRACY with, as Kucinich's slogan says, "NO STRINGS"?!
www.kucinich.us
Kucinich/Nader
Let every democrat friend of yours know (if true) that you won't be voting for Clinton, Obama, or Edwards. 2006 and the resulting "impeachment is off the table" should be a lesson that Democrats won't result in an electorate educated by accountability. An campaign that pointed out the emperor's new clothes would at least serve to educate, even if it lost.
I wish a gay rights group would follow Hillary around with the same enthusiasm; she has proven herself to be a complete fake in so many areas.
"It's just not fair to say that people who voted for the resolution wanted war." It IS fair to say that those that voted for the resolution did precious little to prevent it. It is also fair to say that those who continue to maintain it was the right thing to do actually need a frontal lobotomy.
Messaged all 100 Senators today urging impeachment. In the message to Hillary I told her that out of our family of lifelong Democrats none of us would be voting for her, but there was still time to redeem herself. All she has to do is immediately begin proceedings of impeachment of the Administration. I'm not holding my breath.
I Love the Kucinch/Nader ticket! But don't expect a majority of Dems to stand up for anything. I tried to express a few novel ideas to a supposedly progressive web blog, democrats.com, and was censored and blocked for voicing my opinion that progressive democrats vote their consciences at least until the convention to assure that they had a say in the democratic platform.
I think the thing that caused (so called) progressive democrat Mr. Bob Fertig (the moderator)to block my further discussion and erase all my previous posts was my suggestion that democrats support instant run-off voting and a strong third party to help bring issues that are censored, marginalized or ignored (such as the fact that we want the war ended NOW!) by mainstream democrats to the forefront.
Without a strong third party, we end up with a watered down democracy and a media sponsored "American Idol" style primary process that (even more than a year before it begins) has narrowed the process to Hillary vs. Barack.
I proudly voted for Ralph Nader in 2000 and 2004 and if Hillary is the Democratic nominee I would love the opportunity to vote for either Nader or an independent Dennis Kucinich in 2008. Until Democrats realize that without liberal and progressive independent voters on their side and pushing the envelope of democracy they are nothing but political dinosaurs ripe for extinction.
Go Code Pink! Keep Hillary's feet to the fire.
As far as war funding - Let Bush veto the bill - then give him nothing! No funding bill at all - we may not be able to overturn the veto but we don't want to fund the war anyway. If "W" wants the war so bad let him and the oil companies fund it - and fight it!
AMEN to an independent Gore/Kucinich ticket. The Democratic Party will render itself completely irrelevant if they offer up another "lesser evil" candidate.
The 'leadership's' current NON-responsiveness in Congress just goes to show they still expect to do business-as-usual...no matter what We The People want. It's a shame that so many progressives chose to hold their noses and vote for John 'Reporting for Duty' Kerry last time around. That kind of loyalty only encourages another debacle in 2008 (no matter WHICH major party candidate wins).
I think it's time for every genuine progressive currently claiming membership in the Dem Party to walk out en masse from any convention that nominates Hillary. Those 80 - 90 members SHOULD have done so a long time ago.
I have been saying for sometime now that we as true progressives and leftists must make a stand this time around and not hold our noses anymore for any lesser evil. I will not vote for any of the supposed Democratic "front runners". I'm sorry to hear that Dems.com is censoring anything and not allowing free-wheeling discussion. They apparently join DailyKos in the censorship camp (not allowing any 9/11 conspiracy postings), which is a really BAD sign for the future of democracy if liberals practice censorship.
I do not support another Gore run. You get one shot at the Presidency, no more Stephensons. Besides, Gore did put Lieberman on his ticket, how liberal is he really? His take on the environment is helpful, but very incomplete, and in some ways mis-leading. He, and every other mainstream environmentalist downplays the extent of our environmental problems and the truly Draconian steps that need to be taken to give life on Earth a fighting chance at survival - like suggesting we can keep our car culture by just changing fuels and conserving more. And NOBODY is talking about the biggest problem of all - overpopulation. I might expect that from father of four Gore (all born after the 1972 Club of Rome report on overpopulation). I don't care how "girlie" your sperm is, you don't get 4 tries for a son in this day and age.
One of the most pleasant short conversations I've ever had was at the first media conference in St. Louis where I leaned over to Code Pink's Medea Benjamin and thanked her for CP's protest and her arrest at the Democratic National Convention in 2004. I love Code Pink - they are the steel among true progressives. Kucinich/Nader? I would crawl across a parking lot of broken glass on my knees to support THAT ticket!
Aside from Kucinich, Obama IS the anti-war candidate. He was against the war publicly since October 2002, through to the March 2004 Democratic Senate primary, when he was one of 7 candidates in a field that included a millionaire investment banker and a machine-backed political scion (suffice it to say he was not favored to win at the time). He is a true progressive who had a 100% voting record with Peace Action and 89% with PeacePAC in 2005, and 89% for US PIRG (founded by Nader) in 2006. Also 95% League of Conservation Voters and 100% rating by IL Enviro Council & IL Sierra Club in 2003. [verify it on www.vote-smart.org]
I am all for IRV and building the Green Party- locally and regionally, as we've done in IL with 12% in the last election and permanent ballot access. Do that and vote for (and support) Obama. I voted for Nader twice and Obama is still the most genuine and sincere politician I have ever met or heard speak. He is a front-runner you can support without holding your nose, or crossing fingers and saying prayers. This next election we can't afford to lose, to Clinton or any [other] Republican.
It would be my desire that the Dems make it clear to Hillbillery that she is not the parties choice. Maybe then she could fade away and stop making the party look like flip-flop, back seat drivers with king george in the drivers seat. Of all the potential Dems in the presidential race, I would rank hillbillery at the bottom of the deck and Obama at the top. I congratulate code pink for keeping after her worthless two faced act.
I will be moving back to PA very soon to begin campainging for a kucinich/Gore or with Nader ticket. It is shameful that our party leadership continue to ignore our wishes and giving us a take it or leave it ticket. That Demm.com censors a free exchange of ideas which is one of the four pillars of a democratic society does not surprise me after all the media does not care which party they suck up to as long that the centrist bush ideology is followed and upheld by such party. By the way the other three are... true elections by the people where every vote count, a free and independent media, and finally a respect and an affirmation of human rights and civil liberties. Do we have it right in the land of torture light?
Let's give Hillary a political life-line and cover for her vote on the Iraq war. She voted for the resolution as a statement of purpose to go to war, not to authorize to go to war. Poor naive woman, those bad male chauvinist neo-cons tricked her.