Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Gonzales Lied Before, to Congress
It turns out that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales lied to reporters on March 13 about the scandal over the fired prosecutors.
At that time, Gonzales said he "was not involved in any discussions about what was going on" with the firings.
"On Friday night, however, the Justice Department revealed Gonzales's participation in a Nov. 27 meeting where such plans were made," the AP reports.
He was in on a very detailed discussion of a "five-step plan for carrying out the firings of the prosecutors," according to the AP story, which cited Gonzales's aides as well as documents the Justice Department released Friday night.
But this is not the first time the Attorney General has lied.
He also lied—to Congress—back in January 2005, during his confirmation process.
According to a March 6, 2005, article in The New York Times, Gonzales submitted a written response to a question from a Senator about the Bush Administration's policy of "extraordinary rendition."
Here's what Gonzales said: "The policy of the United States is not to transfer individuals to countries where we believe they likely will be tortured, whether those individuals are being transferred from inside or outside the United States." He added that he was "not aware of anyone in the Executive Branch authorizing any transfer of a detainee in violation of that policy."
But, when Gonzales was White House counsel, Bush signed a directive shortly after 9/11 that authorized the CIA to transfer suspected terrorists to foreign countries for interrogation. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International estimate that the United States has transferred between 100 and 150 detainees to countries notorious for torture.
So when Congress looks into Gonzales's role—and integrity—in the sacking of the prosecutors, they may also want to investigate his role—and integrity and possible criminality—in the much more serious scandal of exporting prisoners for torture.
© 2007 The Progressive
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

4 Comments so far
Show AllMatt has a fantastic idea here. If the investigation of the Federal attorney purge expands to include Gonzales's acts to permit and legalize torture and abuse, then it sets up the possibility of a prosecution to render justice to the ultimate absurdity: the highest officer of "justice" who has complete disrespect for domestic law, the truth, and ratified treaties (particularly Geneva and the Torture Convention). May Congress gain a spine--and a conscience. (We can hope, but I won't hold my breath. At least Matthew Rothschild has a spine and a conscience.)
I can't think of one member of the Bush regime that hasn't lied to Congress, the people, soldiers, media - even themselves. I can't imagine how any member of the government could believe otherwise.
What I regetfully can believe is that far too many citizens of this once great country believe this ship of fools does tell the truth.
Can an AG be impeached or only forced to resign? I REALLY want this monster to go to be held to account and go to prison for his lies! It could set a precident that would send a REALLY strong message to future AGs.
Bushies swear only allegiance to W - the Constitution, which they all swore under oath to protect, is merely an inconvenient bit of history to be ignored and forgotten. Gonzalez is just another in the long line of incompetent, ignorant ideologues that make the Bush administration the most failed in history. Was this the Bush idea of accountability and integrity that he promised to return to the White House after that impeachable Clinton had defiled it so? And we thought Ashcroft was bad...